Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2101 - 2110 of 20855 for word.
Search results 2101 - 2110 of 20855 for word.
State v. Quincy Ferguson
with the State that the words "fees" and "disbursements" must be given different meanings, we nevertheless
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16953 - 2005-03-31
with the State that the words "fees" and "disbursements" must be given different meanings, we nevertheless
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16953 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
directing where arbitration is to take place is ambiguous because the word “lives” can be understood
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100892 - 2017-09-21
directing where arbitration is to take place is ambiguous because the word “lives” can be understood
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100892 - 2017-09-21
D.M.K., Inc. v. Town of Pittsfield
that the word “shall” in Wis. Stat. § 60.47(3) implies some degree of discretion beyond determining whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21557 - 2006-03-22
that the word “shall” in Wis. Stat. § 60.47(3) implies some degree of discretion beyond determining whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21557 - 2006-03-22
La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Pamela E.P.
by the statutory wording into believing that any specific actions she may have taken during the period when her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13656 - 2005-03-31
by the statutory wording into believing that any specific actions she may have taken during the period when her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13656 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Though we are unpersuaded by the County’s interpretation of the word “facility” in WIS. STAT. § 51.20(7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120188 - 2014-09-15
Though we are unpersuaded by the County’s interpretation of the word “facility” in WIS. STAT. § 51.20(7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120188 - 2014-09-15
State of Wisconsin-Department of Corrections v. David H. Schwarz
to the wording of the statute itself. Wisconsin Stat. § 304.072(3) directs: (3) Except as provided in s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6714 - 2005-03-31
to the wording of the statute itself. Wisconsin Stat. § 304.072(3) directs: (3) Except as provided in s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6714 - 2005-03-31
State v. Esteban R.M.
that he had not used certain words included in the statement. Esteban told counsel that he had only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11895 - 2005-03-31
that he had not used certain words included in the statement. Esteban told counsel that he had only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11895 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Regarding the first element, a handwritten “x” appears over the word “intercourse,” and the word “contact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1040888 - 2025-11-25
. Regarding the first element, a handwritten “x” appears over the word “intercourse,” and the word “contact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1040888 - 2025-11-25
[PDF]
La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Pamela E.P.
by the statutory wording into believing that any specific actions she may have taken during the period when her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13655 - 2017-09-21
by the statutory wording into believing that any specific actions she may have taken during the period when her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13655 - 2017-09-21
James M. Kriska v. Madison Area Technical College
did not check this because, in his words, he “didn’t realize there was a penalty involved in my
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5851 - 2005-03-31
did not check this because, in his words, he “didn’t realize there was a penalty involved in my
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5851 - 2005-03-31