Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21001 - 21010 of 82603 for order for a biological sample for drug testing.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that the Court has entered the following opinion and order: 2017AP1101-CRNM State of Wisconsin v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=227407 - 2018-11-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
and recommended additional testing to determine the degree of impairment and likelihood of recovery. ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234412 - 2019-02-13

B & P Drywall v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
should be based on his average weekly wage of $700. B & P argues that James met the nine-part test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4007 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Village of Lannon v. Wood-Land Contractors, Inc.
the statute. From this judgment, Wood-Land has appealed. ¶4 Our first order of business is to construe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4880 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Anthony T. Jones
) and from an order denying his motion to suppress evidence. Jones contends that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24927 - 2017-09-21

State v. Paul L. Vogel
)(a), (b), Stats. He filed a motion seeking an “order striking from the Complaint the prior conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14683 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
sobriety tests. Upon his failure of those tests, Berghuis was arrested on suspicion of operating while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=993056 - 2025-08-06

State v. Anthony T. Jones
. § 961.41(3g)(e) and from an order denying his motion to suppress evidence. Jones contends that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24927 - 2006-04-26

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
while under the influence of an intoxicant and refusing a chemical test of his blood, following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174954 - 2017-09-21

State v. Mary C. Z.
and an order of the circuit court for Taylor County: Douglas T. Fox, Judge. Affirmed in part; reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6882 - 2005-03-31