Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21011 - 21020 of 64751 for b's.

Kenneth L. Grover v.
with his client, in violation of SCR 20:1.5(b),[1] in that he did not adequately explain the basis on which
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16983 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of or has been used in the commission of any crime[.]” Sec. 968.13(1)(b). The person seeking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=694036 - 2023-08-23

[PDF] NOTICE
This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(b). All references to the Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28923 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
reduced as the Respondent has requested. …. [B]ased on the long-term marriage … of 23 years, I do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45689 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
lacked probable cause to believe that a traffic violation had occurred, justifying the traffic stop. B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103152 - 2013-10-16

State v. Justin David Schwartz
of the circuit court for Racine County: allan b. torhorst, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 ANDERSON, P.J.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7220 - 2005-03-31

State v. Daniel T. Raymond
). ¶8 Wisconsin Stat. § 345.20(1)(b) provides that “‘traffic regulation’ means a provision of chs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5301 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
that he was ten minutes late for his curfew. The circuit court continued: [B]ut certainly the most
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55648 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
. The court concluded by stating: “[b]ecause our holding will require different practices by [trial] courts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36522 - 2009-05-18

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Dane County: JUAN B. COLÁS, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=639381 - 2023-03-30