Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21011 - 21020 of 98582 for civil court case status online.
Search results 21011 - 21020 of 98582 for civil court case status online.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court stated that it “listened to the testimony that’s been made on this case so far” and applied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1091025 - 2026-03-12
court stated that it “listened to the testimony that’s been made on this case so far” and applied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1091025 - 2026-03-12
Certification
conduct while out on parole on the 1992 case. In October 2008, the circuit court vacated Spaeth’s
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100088 - 2013-07-30
conduct while out on parole on the 1992 case. In October 2008, the circuit court vacated Spaeth’s
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100088 - 2013-07-30
[PDF]
Certification
enticement, based on his conduct while out on parole on the 1992 case. In October 2008, the circuit court
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100088 - 2017-09-21
enticement, based on his conduct while out on parole on the 1992 case. In October 2008, the circuit court
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100088 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
In the dispositional orders for the JIPS petitions, the court indicated that the JIPS cases were “counseled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=594971 - 2022-11-29
In the dispositional orders for the JIPS petitions, the court indicated that the JIPS cases were “counseled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=594971 - 2022-11-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
misstated to the circuit court that, at the time Schwan committed the offense in this case, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209478 - 2018-03-08
misstated to the circuit court that, at the time Schwan committed the offense in this case, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209478 - 2018-03-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that led to the charges in the present case, Burnett County Circuit Court case No. 2006CF65. On the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163235 - 2017-09-21
that led to the charges in the present case, Burnett County Circuit Court case No. 2006CF65. On the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163235 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and the order. BACKGROUND ¶2 In Price County Circuit Court case No. 2015CF54, the State charged Wagner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=223889 - 2018-10-23
and the order. BACKGROUND ¶2 In Price County Circuit Court case No. 2015CF54, the State charged Wagner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=223889 - 2018-10-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
case before Williams’ sentencing. The court acknowledged that the information “change[d] the whole
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103417 - 2017-09-21
case before Williams’ sentencing. The court acknowledged that the information “change[d] the whole
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103417 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a complaint in Milwaukee County Circuit Court Case No. 2011CF810. In the complaint, the State charged Bell
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155861 - 2017-09-21
a complaint in Milwaukee County Circuit Court Case No. 2011CF810. In the complaint, the State charged Bell
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155861 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is threatening your child. And that has never happened in this case. The court remarked that J.W. “is a good
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=573742 - 2022-10-04
is threatening your child. And that has never happened in this case. The court remarked that J.W. “is a good
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=573742 - 2022-10-04