Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21011 - 21020 of 68502 for did.
Search results 21011 - 21020 of 68502 for did.
[PDF]
State v. Paul A. Balthazor
intoxicated. We conclude the officer did, and we therefore affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 State Trooper Sam
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6967 - 2017-09-20
intoxicated. We conclude the officer did, and we therefore affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 State Trooper Sam
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6967 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Rochelle L. Oestreich
right to file a response, which she did. According to the criminal complaint, which formed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12108 - 2017-09-21
right to file a response, which she did. According to the criminal complaint, which formed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12108 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Paul L. Eickert
should modify his sentence by removing jail time. Because the court did not misuse its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13735 - 2014-09-15
should modify his sentence by removing jail time. Because the court did not misuse its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13735 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in E.R.W. that this collateral consequence did not exist when a CHIPS dispositional order did not place
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=780409 - 2024-03-26
in E.R.W. that this collateral consequence did not exist when a CHIPS dispositional order did not place
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=780409 - 2024-03-26
Gary Rowland v. Labor & Industry Review Commission
. Rowland challenges the admission of statements made by Weyerhaeuser employees who did not testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14212 - 2005-03-31
. Rowland challenges the admission of statements made by Weyerhaeuser employees who did not testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14212 - 2005-03-31
State v. David L. Canedy
an opportunity to explain why he did not earlier raise the ineffectiveness issue. State v. Canedy, No. 93‑2987
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10351 - 2005-03-31
an opportunity to explain why he did not earlier raise the ineffectiveness issue. State v. Canedy, No. 93‑2987
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10351 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Thomas B.
outside another boy’s bedroom, which is a crime of criminal damage to property. He did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20795 - 2017-09-21
outside another boy’s bedroom, which is a crime of criminal damage to property. He did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20795 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
did not reduce the assessment for 2003 and 2004. In 2005, the Town of Linwood assessed the property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45164 - 2009-12-29
did not reduce the assessment for 2003 and 2004. In 2005, the Town of Linwood assessed the property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45164 - 2009-12-29
[PDF]
State v. Amanda A. Ringler
officer did not have reasonable suspicion to stop her vehicle. We disagree and affirm the revocation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3984 - 2017-09-20
officer did not have reasonable suspicion to stop her vehicle. We disagree and affirm the revocation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3984 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. William L. Brown
direct appeal or could have been raised in his direct appeal, we conclude that the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25977 - 2017-09-21
direct appeal or could have been raised in his direct appeal, we conclude that the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25977 - 2017-09-21