Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21011 - 21020 of 68502 for did.
Search results 21011 - 21020 of 68502 for did.
[PDF]
State v. Paul L. Eickert
should modify his sentence by removing jail time. Because the court did not misuse its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13735 - 2014-09-15
should modify his sentence by removing jail time. Because the court did not misuse its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13735 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in E.R.W. that this collateral consequence did not exist when a CHIPS dispositional order did not place
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=780409 - 2024-03-26
in E.R.W. that this collateral consequence did not exist when a CHIPS dispositional order did not place
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=780409 - 2024-03-26
Gary Rowland v. Labor & Industry Review Commission
. Rowland challenges the admission of statements made by Weyerhaeuser employees who did not testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14212 - 2005-03-31
. Rowland challenges the admission of statements made by Weyerhaeuser employees who did not testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14212 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
; and (2) that he was denied his right to equal protection of the law because the State did not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88172 - 2012-10-15
; and (2) that he was denied his right to equal protection of the law because the State did not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88172 - 2012-10-15
State v. David L. Canedy
an opportunity to explain why he did not earlier raise the ineffectiveness issue. State v. Canedy, No. 93‑2987
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10351 - 2005-03-31
an opportunity to explain why he did not earlier raise the ineffectiveness issue. State v. Canedy, No. 93‑2987
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10351 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
him with sufficient income to pay $650 per month.[1] We conclude that Kevin did not present
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42784 - 2009-10-28
him with sufficient income to pay $650 per month.[1] We conclude that Kevin did not present
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42784 - 2009-10-28
[PDF]
State v. Sherman Williams
it admitted “other crimes” evidence pursuant to § 904.04, STATS. Because the trial court did not erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9024 - 2017-09-19
it admitted “other crimes” evidence pursuant to § 904.04, STATS. Because the trial court did not erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9024 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Thomas B.
outside another boy’s bedroom, which is a crime of criminal damage to property. He did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20795 - 2017-09-21
outside another boy’s bedroom, which is a crime of criminal damage to property. He did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20795 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
did not reduce the assessment for 2003 and 2004. In 2005, the Town of Linwood assessed the property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45164 - 2009-12-29
did not reduce the assessment for 2003 and 2004. In 2005, the Town of Linwood assessed the property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45164 - 2009-12-29
State v. J.T. Jones-Johnson
probation and that the victim’s postconviction testimony that she did not want Jones-Johnson to go to prison
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14601 - 2005-03-31
probation and that the victim’s postconviction testimony that she did not want Jones-Johnson to go to prison
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14601 - 2005-03-31