Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21021 - 21030 of 39175 for c's.
Search results 21021 - 21030 of 39175 for c's.
County of Adams v. Robert Ruffer
)(c). The County based its appeal on § 15.0 of the Adams County Shoreline Protection Ordinance, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13171 - 2005-03-31
)(c). The County based its appeal on § 15.0 of the Adams County Shoreline Protection Ordinance, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13171 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the minor, as described in [WIS. STAT. No. 2018AP97 3 §] 48.415(1)(a)3., (b), and (c
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237565 - 2019-03-20
the minor, as described in [WIS. STAT. No. 2018AP97 3 §] 48.415(1)(a)3., (b), and (c
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237565 - 2019-03-20
2010 WI APP 119
from future taxes under this statute, however, because Wis. Stat. § 74.35(5)(c) requires a taxpayer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52222 - 2010-08-24
from future taxes under this statute, however, because Wis. Stat. § 74.35(5)(c) requires a taxpayer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52222 - 2010-08-24
Lori A. Johnson v. City of Waukesha
) the agency acted according to law; (c) the action was arbitrary, oppressive or unreasonable; and (d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3667 - 2005-03-31
) the agency acted according to law; (c) the action was arbitrary, oppressive or unreasonable; and (d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3667 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(c) (2009-10). All references
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85108 - 2012-07-18
] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(c) (2009-10). All references
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85108 - 2012-07-18
[PDF]
NOTICE
: ELSA C. LAMELAS, Judge. Affirmed. Before Wedemeyer, P.J., Fine and Kessler, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28761 - 2014-09-15
: ELSA C. LAMELAS, Judge. Affirmed. Before Wedemeyer, P.J., Fine and Kessler, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28761 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the following opinion and order: 2022AP939 State of Wisconsin v. Joshua M. Foulk (L. C. Nos
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=835159 - 2024-08-06
the following opinion and order: 2022AP939 State of Wisconsin v. Joshua M. Foulk (L. C. Nos
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=835159 - 2024-08-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
opinion and order: 2022AP1917-CR State of Wisconsin v. Skyler K. Bohling (L. C
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=884850 - 2024-12-03
opinion and order: 2022AP1917-CR State of Wisconsin v. Skyler K. Bohling (L. C
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=884850 - 2024-12-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Andrew M. Szatkowski (L. C. No. 2020CM929) Before Gill, J.1 Summary disposition orders may
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=891247 - 2024-12-17
. Andrew M. Szatkowski (L. C. No. 2020CM929) Before Gill, J.1 Summary disposition orders may
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=891247 - 2024-12-17
Leon Irby v. Jon E. Litscher
to the Department of Justice under § 802.05(3)(c). By the Court.—Orders affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5769 - 2005-03-31
to the Department of Justice under § 802.05(3)(c). By the Court.—Orders affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5769 - 2005-03-31