Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21031 - 21040 of 69170 for as he.
Search results 21031 - 21040 of 69170 for as he.
[PDF]
Daniel P. Gaugert v. Howard E. Duve
a home. The Gaugerts knew Duve through Daniel’s brother. Duve was the owner of a farm upon which he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12046 - 2017-09-21
a home. The Gaugerts knew Duve through Daniel’s brother. Duve was the owner of a farm upon which he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12046 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Frontsheet
to make restitution to the Fund and certain clients and, finally, we conclude that he should be assessed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=285680 - 2020-09-09
to make restitution to the Fund and certain clients and, finally, we conclude that he should be assessed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=285680 - 2020-09-09
City of Madison v. Jeffrey Crossfield
Court concluding that he violated a city zoning ordinance. Crossfield argues that: (1) the ordinance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5951 - 2005-03-31
Court concluding that he violated a city zoning ordinance. Crossfield argues that: (1) the ordinance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5951 - 2005-03-31
Daniel P. Gaugert v. Howard E. Duve
through Daniel’s brother. Duve was the owner of a farm upon which he lived, and the Gaugerts became
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12046 - 2005-03-31
through Daniel’s brother. Duve was the owner of a farm upon which he lived, and the Gaugerts became
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12046 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
prior record; (3) “[t]he type and seriousness of the offense”; (4) “[t]he adequacy and suitability
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=584811 - 2022-11-02
prior record; (3) “[t]he type and seriousness of the offense”; (4) “[t]he adequacy and suitability
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=584811 - 2022-11-02
State v. Rory D. Revels
and to present a defense.” Alternatively, he argues that the trial court’s order, which he says requires him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13200 - 2005-03-31
and to present a defense.” Alternatively, he argues that the trial court’s order, which he says requires him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13200 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 30
of his probation. He seeks sentence credit against this sentence for time he alleges he spent serving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27900 - 2014-09-15
of his probation. He seeks sentence credit against this sentence for time he alleges he spent serving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27900 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a consecutive, rather than concurrent, sentence on a particular count. Christopher also asserts that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=990081 - 2025-07-29
a consecutive, rather than concurrent, sentence on a particular count. Christopher also asserts that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=990081 - 2025-07-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 343.305(10), upon a determination that he unreasonably refused to submit to a chemical test of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66885 - 2014-09-15
. § 343.305(10), upon a determination that he unreasonably refused to submit to a chemical test of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66885 - 2014-09-15
Mark Regal v. General Motors Corporation
was not repaired. Regal alleged that on December 1, 2000, he demanded that GM provide a refund of the purchase
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5016 - 2005-03-31
was not repaired. Regal alleged that on December 1, 2000, he demanded that GM provide a refund of the purchase
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5016 - 2005-03-31