Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21031 - 21040 of 58483 for speedy trial.
Search results 21031 - 21040 of 58483 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
otherwise noted. 2 At trial, one of the State’s witnesses explained that a gem pack is a small “clear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=757140 - 2024-01-30
otherwise noted. 2 At trial, one of the State’s witnesses explained that a gem pack is a small “clear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=757140 - 2024-01-30
[PDF]
Megan M. Lord v. Hubbell, Inc.
children of the decedent.3 The trial court dismissed both claims on the ground of improper service
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10665 - 2017-09-20
children of the decedent.3 The trial court dismissed both claims on the ground of improper service
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10665 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Emmett Kapries Dunlap
for second-degree intentional homicide, as a party to the crime, after a trial by jury, No(s). 96-1283
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10783 - 2017-09-20
for second-degree intentional homicide, as a party to the crime, after a trial by jury, No(s). 96-1283
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10783 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Scott Zastrow
)(a). Zastrow additionally appeals the trial court’s denial of his postconviction motions. 2 Zastrow
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4173 - 2017-09-19
)(a). Zastrow additionally appeals the trial court’s denial of his postconviction motions. 2 Zastrow
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4173 - 2017-09-19
State v. Scott Zastrow
(OWI) contrary to Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(a). Zastrow additionally appeals the trial court’s denial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4173 - 2005-03-31
(OWI) contrary to Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(a). Zastrow additionally appeals the trial court’s denial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4173 - 2005-03-31
Megan M. Lord v. Hubbell, Inc.
children of the decedent.[3] The trial court dismissed both claims on the ground of improper service
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10665 - 2005-03-31
children of the decedent.[3] The trial court dismissed both claims on the ground of improper service
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10665 - 2005-03-31
State v. Sharon A. Dixon
. §§ 961.16(2)(a)(10) and 941.41(3g)(a)1.[1] Dixon also appeals from the trial court’s order denying her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3555 - 2005-03-31
. §§ 961.16(2)(a)(10) and 941.41(3g)(a)1.[1] Dixon also appeals from the trial court’s order denying her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3555 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Scott Zastrow
)(a). Zastrow additionally appeals the trial court’s denial of his postconviction motions. 2 Zastrow
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3716 - 2017-09-19
)(a). Zastrow additionally appeals the trial court’s denial of his postconviction motions. 2 Zastrow
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3716 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for his protective placement under WIS. STAT. § 55.08(1) following a jury trial. He argues that Wood
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=899230 - 2025-01-09
for his protective placement under WIS. STAT. § 55.08(1) following a jury trial. He argues that Wood
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=899230 - 2025-01-09
[PDF]
Howard A. Koop v. Woodlake Trails Development Company, Ltd.
supports the assessment; and (4) the trial court erred because (a) it entered an order in the absence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7776 - 2017-09-19
supports the assessment; and (4) the trial court erred because (a) it entered an order in the absence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7776 - 2017-09-19