Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21041 - 21050 of 58996 for SMALL CLAIMS.

[PDF] State v. Opheous L. Simmons
to withdraw his no contest plea, asserted the existence of a new factor requiring resentencing and claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8180 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
and claiming a trespass and continuing trespass against Midwest. ANALYSIS ¶4 Midwest first argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36243 - 2009-04-20

[PDF] State v. Drazen Markovic
trial or postconviction No. 2004AP1560 2 attorney. He claims the trial court erred: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18341 - 2017-09-21

Charles A. Ghidorzi v. Steven J. Pergande
an existing disputed claim; it constitutes a defense to an action to enforce the claim.” Flambeau Products
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18816 - 2005-06-29

State v. Joseph Williams
to meet his burden of proof in his ineffective assistance of counsel claim; and that the thirty-year
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11239 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
by examining the claim that Mason should be permitted to withdraw his no-contest plea because the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100406 - 2013-08-05

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
) (where a defendant seeks an evidentiary hearing on an ineffective assistance of counsel claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90616 - 2014-09-15

Citizens for the Preservation of the St. Croix, Inc. v. Riviera Airport, Inc.
. (Citizens) lack standing to pursue the zoning claim under § 59.97(11),[3] and the trial court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12106 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
at a new trial in this matter.” In support of the claim, counsel stated that, “upon information and belief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74595 - 2011-12-05

State v. Warren A. Moffett
denying his postconviction motion for a new trial. Moffett claims that he is entitled to an evidentiary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4321 - 2005-03-31