Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21041 - 21050 of 83379 for simple case search.

[PDF] 02-01 Amendment of Wis. Stats. Ch. 809, Rules of Appellate Procedure, and SCR 71.04 governing court reporters (Effective 1-1-03)
need not be filed in appeals brought under s. 809.105, 809.107, 809.32, or 974.06 (7), or in cases
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=955 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Kevin P. Sullivan
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 96-2244-CR Complete Title of Case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17141 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] 02-01 Amendment of Wis. Stats. Ch. 809, Rules of Appellate Procedure, and SCR 71.04 governing court reporters (Effective 1-1-03)
need not be filed in appeals brought under s. 809.105, 809.107, 809.32, or 974.06 (7), or in cases
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1127 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] 02-01 Amendment of Wis. Stats. Ch. 809, Rules of Appellate Procedure, and SCR 71.04 governing court reporters (Effective 1-1-03)
need not be filed in appeals brought under s. 809.105, 809.107, 809.32, or 974.06 (7), or in cases
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=955 - 2017-09-20

State v. Kevin P. Sullivan
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 96-2244-CR Complete Title of Case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17141 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Waupaca County v. Terry L. Winters
indicated she had not discussed the case with Donna nor did she have any previous knowledge of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20553 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
no connection with the sentence in this case. We therefore affirm the order. ¶2 On December 19, 2006
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35512 - 2009-02-09

[PDF] CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=448374 - 2021-11-03

[PDF] State v. Frank Anastasi
in 1998, including the armed burglary which is the subject of this case. His probation on the 1990
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7441 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, and their dispute concerns only the application of that law to the facts of this case. ¶5 Hanley argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=969385 - 2025-06-12