Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21051 - 21060 of 68466 for did.
Search results 21051 - 21060 of 68466 for did.
State v. Terry L. Cleveland
stated that he did not dispute those facts. The prosecutor then suggested to the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11121 - 2005-03-31
stated that he did not dispute those facts. The prosecutor then suggested to the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11121 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jeremy M. F.
photographs was a deliberate trial strategy in that No. 97-1063 4 he did not think it would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12344 - 2017-09-21
photographs was a deliberate trial strategy in that No. 97-1063 4 he did not think it would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12344 - 2017-09-21
Patricia Laux v. County of Waupaca
on appeal are whether the Lauxes are precluded from arguing that there was a mistrial when they did not make
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12495 - 2005-03-31
on appeal are whether the Lauxes are precluded from arguing that there was a mistrial when they did not make
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12495 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
that it was not bound by the parties’ recommendations and that he did not otherwise know this information. Following
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135555 - 2015-03-03
that it was not bound by the parties’ recommendations and that he did not otherwise know this information. Following
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135555 - 2015-03-03
State v. Samuel D. Clay
. At the preliminary examination, the State did not present evidence on the § 161.49, Stats., penalty enhancer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9431 - 2005-03-31
. At the preliminary examination, the State did not present evidence on the § 161.49, Stats., penalty enhancer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9431 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
did not have the authority to do so, that the circuit court improperly considered the sexual assault
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33999 - 2008-09-15
did not have the authority to do so, that the circuit court improperly considered the sexual assault
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33999 - 2008-09-15
State v. Carol A. Hayes
it imposed the precise sentence it did, which exceeded the parties’ joint sentencing recommendation. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25309 - 2006-05-30
it imposed the precise sentence it did, which exceeded the parties’ joint sentencing recommendation. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25309 - 2006-05-30
Elizabeth A. Ryder v. Society Insurance
conclude that the trial court’s order did not concern a special proceeding, and we therefore order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11925 - 2005-03-31
conclude that the trial court’s order did not concern a special proceeding, and we therefore order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11925 - 2005-03-31
State v. James R. Brownson
of the computer, but a purchaser, and that he did not intentionally fail to return rental property because he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11911 - 2005-03-31
of the computer, but a purchaser, and that he did not intentionally fail to return rental property because he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11911 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
part of a polygraph examination, and it was unfair to require him to report conduct that he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56499 - 2010-11-08
part of a polygraph examination, and it was unfair to require him to report conduct that he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56499 - 2010-11-08