Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21061 - 21070 of 58952 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 21061 - 21070 of 58952 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Duane Lesky v. County of La Crosse
appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the County of La Crosse on his claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14245 - 2005-03-31
appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the County of La Crosse on his claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14245 - 2005-03-31
State v. Opheous L. Simmons
, asserted the existence of a new factor requiring resentencing and claimed his trial counsel was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8180 - 2005-03-31
, asserted the existence of a new factor requiring resentencing and claimed his trial counsel was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8180 - 2005-03-31
State v. Joseph Williams
to meet his burden of proof in his ineffective assistance of counsel claim; and that the thirty-year
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11241 - 2005-03-31
to meet his burden of proof in his ineffective assistance of counsel claim; and that the thirty-year
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11241 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
In the no-merit report, appellate counsel examines whether Bohringer could pursue an arguably meritorious claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=877041 - 2024-11-19
In the no-merit report, appellate counsel examines whether Bohringer could pursue an arguably meritorious claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=877041 - 2024-11-19
State v. Drazen Markovic
. He claims the trial court erred: (1) because his postconviction attorney should have raised a claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18341 - 2005-05-31
. He claims the trial court erred: (1) because his postconviction attorney should have raised a claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18341 - 2005-05-31
Adams Outdoor Advertising, Ltd. v. City of Madison
and then the City Board of Review.[4] For both years, Adams claimed the fair market value of its billboards
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25888 - 2006-07-12
and then the City Board of Review.[4] For both years, Adams claimed the fair market value of its billboards
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25888 - 2006-07-12
[PDF]
State v. Richard A. Moeck
2005 WI 57 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2003AP2-CR COMPLETE TITLE: S...
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18067 - 2017-09-21
2005 WI 57 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2003AP2-CR COMPLETE TITLE: S...
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18067 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Adams Outdoor Advertising, Ltd. v. City of Madison
of Assessors and then the City Board of Review.4 For both years, Adams claimed the fair market value
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25888 - 2017-09-21
of Assessors and then the City Board of Review.4 For both years, Adams claimed the fair market value
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25888 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
claim of ineffective assistance of counsel and in denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73445 - 2011-11-07
claim of ineffective assistance of counsel and in denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73445 - 2011-11-07
[PDF]
_WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS
to support a claim of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, or law of the case. Per curiam opinions may
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=462637 - 2021-12-09
to support a claim of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, or law of the case. Per curiam opinions may
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=462637 - 2021-12-09