Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21061 - 21070 of 29817 for des.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
). No. 2018AP887 6 de novo. Ott v. Peppertree Resort Villas, Inc., 2006 WI App 77, ¶11, 292 Wis. 2d 173
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248668 - 2019-10-16

[PDF] Norvin Lewis v. Physicians Insurance Company of Wisconsin
, our review is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315, 401 N.W.2d 816
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14951 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI APP 108
of a statute to specific facts are questions of law that we review de novo. Marotz v. Hallman, 2007 WI 89
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32918 - 2014-09-15

State v. Jack R. Hayes
is a question of law we review de novo. Id. Because the trial court did not rule on the deficiency component
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4784 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
has been denied due process and sentenced on inaccurate information is a question of law we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115293 - 2014-06-23

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
are questions of law that we review de novo.” See State v. Alexander, 2013 WI 70, ¶18, 349 Wis. 2d 327, 833
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=224562 - 2018-10-30

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that this court reviews de novo.” Id. ¶13 Smith contends that the circuit court clearly erred in finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219446 - 2018-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of summary judgment de novo. Donaldson v. Urban Land Interests, Inc., 211 Wis. 2d 224, 229-30, 564 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168144 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI APP 109
of summary judgment de novo, and we use the same methodology as did the circuit court. Cole v. Hubanks
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=65781 - 2014-09-15

Gerald Breen v. David J. Winkel
by the circuit court's conclusions of law and decide the matter de novo. First Nat'l Leasing Corp. v. Madison
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9740 - 2005-03-31