Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21061 - 21070 of 40262 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 21061 - 21070 of 40262 for financial disclosure statement.
[PDF]
WI APP 160
scrap, the sniffer, and his statement about using meth in the woods. ¶5 The court found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28815 - 2014-09-15
scrap, the sniffer, and his statement about using meth in the woods. ¶5 The court found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28815 - 2014-09-15
State v. George C. Harrell
court’s sentencing discussion establishes that it relied on inaccurate statements in the PSI, indicating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4205 - 2005-03-31
court’s sentencing discussion establishes that it relied on inaccurate statements in the PSI, indicating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4205 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
and that the judge was actually biased. Id. at 416. To support his claim, Lor cites a number of statements out
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27474 - 2006-12-18
and that the judge was actually biased. Id. at 416. To support his claim, Lor cites a number of statements out
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27474 - 2006-12-18
COURT OF APPEALS
not see Davis aiming a gun at Leonard, and in his statements to police that were introduced at trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50733 - 2010-06-07
not see Davis aiming a gun at Leonard, and in his statements to police that were introduced at trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50733 - 2010-06-07
COURT OF APPEALS
to determine whether it had received the premium payment. George relied on Wisconsin Mutual’s statement to her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56222 - 2010-11-01
to determine whether it had received the premium payment. George relied on Wisconsin Mutual’s statement to her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56222 - 2010-11-01
State v. Mary Krueger
and her prior statements. Inconsistencies in Johnson’s statements do not render her testimony incredible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17982 - 2005-05-02
and her prior statements. Inconsistencies in Johnson’s statements do not render her testimony incredible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17982 - 2005-05-02
[PDF]
State v. Kristoffer A. Ashmore
knowledge; (3) for failing to impeach Laine’s testimony with prior inconsistent statements; (4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14864 - 2017-09-21
knowledge; (3) for failing to impeach Laine’s testimony with prior inconsistent statements; (4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14864 - 2017-09-21
State v. Jeffrey Lilly
refused to give police officer Dzbinski a statement. As cross-examination continued, Lilly testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9493 - 2005-03-31
refused to give police officer Dzbinski a statement. As cross-examination continued, Lilly testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9493 - 2005-03-31
State v. Dion Patton
. After reading Patton his rights, the police elicited a statement from him. Patton stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11370 - 2005-03-31
. After reading Patton his rights, the police elicited a statement from him. Patton stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11370 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Charles G. Campbell
acknowledging that he was “probably” influenced by the officer’s statement that he was sure the person Ornelas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7257 - 2017-09-20
acknowledging that he was “probably” influenced by the officer’s statement that he was sure the person Ornelas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7257 - 2017-09-20