Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21061 - 21070 of 74013 for public records.

State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
argument by Richard D. Martin, assistant state public defender. For the plaintiff
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17519 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
argument by Richard D. Martin, assistant state public defender. For the plaintiff
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17520 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of record No. 2013AP1601 7 accompanied the descriptions in the 1918 deeds. There was also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118853 - 2014-09-15

State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
argument by Richard D. Martin, assistant state public defender. For the plaintiff
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17517 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
reconsideration motion. In denying the motion, it again highlighted ambiguities in the record regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1064859 - 2026-01-21

COURT OF APPEALS
deeds were created. There was evidence that no survey of record accompanied the descriptions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118853 - 2014-08-06

Jeff S. Schmeling v. Richard J. Phelps
a specific parcel. Finally, we conclude that the trial court erred in invalidating the veto on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11431 - 2005-03-31

Frontsheet
properly addressed. ΒΆ8 The record indicates, too, that the circuit court voiced observations that would
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98700 - 2013-07-01

[PDF] WI 56
him in 2008, 4 The record does not disclose
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98700 - 2014-09-15

State v. Ryan D.L.
. For the respondent-respondent there was a brief by Debra Flynn-Parrino, assistant state public defender and Stacy B
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17248 - 2005-03-31