Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21071 - 21080 of 98406 for court records search online.
Search results 21071 - 21080 of 98406 for court records search online.
COURT OF APPEALS
is construction permitted, allowing the court to consider the whole record—including pleadings, findings of fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40656 - 2009-09-09
is construction permitted, allowing the court to consider the whole record—including pleadings, findings of fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40656 - 2009-09-09
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 26, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64852 - 2011-06-19
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 26, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64852 - 2011-06-19
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 23, 2007 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30658 - 2007-10-22
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 23, 2007 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30658 - 2007-10-22
COURT OF APPEALS
. Accordingly, the court concluded that “on the record that we have … it’s not really disputed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66888 - 2011-06-29
. Accordingly, the court concluded that “on the record that we have … it’s not really disputed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66888 - 2011-06-29
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 23, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95626 - 2013-04-22
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 23, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95626 - 2013-04-22
COURT OF APPEALS
met, and because our review of the record shows that the trial court’s colloquy complied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105891 - 2013-12-26
met, and because our review of the record shows that the trial court’s colloquy complied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105891 - 2013-12-26
COURT OF APPEALS
indicates that the court actually relied on undisputed information in the record: that Kerner had brought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91732 - 2013-01-16
indicates that the court actually relied on undisputed information in the record: that Kerner had brought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91732 - 2013-01-16
COURT OF APPEALS
determine the trial court properly exercised its discretion on property division. The record shows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143090 - 2015-06-15
determine the trial court properly exercised its discretion on property division. The record shows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143090 - 2015-06-15
COURT OF APPEALS
been different if raised pretrial. Because the record establishes that the circuit court would have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119547 - 2014-08-13
been different if raised pretrial. Because the record establishes that the circuit court would have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119547 - 2014-08-13
COURT OF APPEALS
decisions when the trial court applies the proper legal standard and relies on the facts in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31822 - 2008-02-13
decisions when the trial court applies the proper legal standard and relies on the facts in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31822 - 2008-02-13

