Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21071 - 21080 of 30242 for de.
Search results 21071 - 21080 of 30242 for de.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Milwaukee County Safety Building Electronic Notice Marcella De Peters Electronic Notice John W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1077752 - 2026-02-17
Milwaukee County Safety Building Electronic Notice Marcella De Peters Electronic Notice John W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1077752 - 2026-02-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that we review de novo. Coston, 222 Wis. 2d at 23. ¶6 “‘Protective placement’ means
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=946179 - 2025-04-24
is a question of law that we review de novo. Coston, 222 Wis. 2d at 23. ¶6 “‘Protective placement’ means
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=946179 - 2025-04-24
[PDF]
WI App 68
to an undisputed set of facts, which also presents a question of law we review de novo.” Id. ¶7 The primary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=432034 - 2021-11-16
to an undisputed set of facts, which also presents a question of law we review de novo.” Id. ¶7 The primary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=432034 - 2021-11-16
Cadott Education Association v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission
to "due weight" or "great bearing." The lowest level of review, the de novo standard, is applied where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8753 - 2005-03-31
to "due weight" or "great bearing." The lowest level of review, the de novo standard, is applied where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8753 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Chad Everts
. This is a constitutional question involving double jeopardy. As such, Everts contends that we should make a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3758 - 2017-09-19
. This is a constitutional question involving double jeopardy. As such, Everts contends that we should make a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3758 - 2017-09-19
Steve Berington v. Wausau Underwriters Insurance Co.
of claim preclusion to a given set of facts is a question of law that we review de novo. Northern States
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10045 - 2005-03-31
of claim preclusion to a given set of facts is a question of law that we review de novo. Northern States
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10045 - 2005-03-31
Hermax Carpet Marts v. Labor & Industry Review Commission
construction which we review de novo. See State v. Ambrose, 196 Wis.2d 768, 776, 540 N.W.2d 208, 211 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12369 - 2005-03-31
construction which we review de novo. See State v. Ambrose, 196 Wis.2d 768, 776, 540 N.W.2d 208, 211 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12369 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jonathan L. Franklin
of constitutional fact, which we review de novo. State v. Owen, 202 Wis.2d 620, 640, 551 N.W.2d 50, 59 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14413 - 2014-09-15
of constitutional fact, which we review de novo. State v. Owen, 202 Wis.2d 620, 640, 551 N.W.2d 50, 59 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14413 - 2014-09-15
Martin Riddell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
, this court reviews the grant of summary judgment de novo, Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304, 315
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13289 - 2005-03-31
, this court reviews the grant of summary judgment de novo, Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304, 315
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13289 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Pedro Enrique-Gaitan
of law, which we review de novo. See State v. Anderson, 219 Wis. 2d 739, 746, 580 N.W.2d 329 (1998
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15682 - 2017-09-21
of law, which we review de novo. See State v. Anderson, 219 Wis. 2d 739, 746, 580 N.W.2d 329 (1998
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15682 - 2017-09-21