Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21071 - 21080 of 29823 for des.
Search results 21071 - 21080 of 29823 for des.
Clayton Ganser v. Claudia Schwartz
. ANALYSIS We review the granting and denial of motions for summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12757 - 2005-03-31
. ANALYSIS We review the granting and denial of motions for summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12757 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Richard C. Wos
of law we review de novo. See State v. Williams, 225 Wis. 2d 159, 168, 591 N.W.2d 823 (1999
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2582 - 2017-09-19
of law we review de novo. See State v. Williams, 225 Wis. 2d 159, 168, 591 N.W.2d 823 (1999
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2582 - 2017-09-19
State v. Norman O. Brown
to effective assistance of counsel is a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. Id. at 634, 369
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12715 - 2005-03-31
to effective assistance of counsel is a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. Id. at 634, 369
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12715 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. Whether a defendant has been denied this due process right is an issue that we review de novo. Id., ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54673 - 2010-09-28
. Whether a defendant has been denied this due process right is an issue that we review de novo. Id., ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54673 - 2010-09-28
Sanford Gibson v. Department of Corrections
(DOR) interpretation of one of its directives, we decided de novo whether a DOR directive was a rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8117 - 2005-03-31
(DOR) interpretation of one of its directives, we decided de novo whether a DOR directive was a rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8117 - 2005-03-31
Jason E. Kellner v. Richard Christian
of a statute is a question of law, which this court reviews de novo without deference to any lower court ruling
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16864 - 2005-03-31
of a statute is a question of law, which this court reviews de novo without deference to any lower court ruling
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16864 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the probable cause standard. See id. This court reviews that question de novo. Id. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136330 - 2015-03-03
the probable cause standard. See id. This court reviews that question de novo. Id. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136330 - 2015-03-03
[PDF]
John W. McDonough v. State of Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development
of these two statutes. ¶10 Statutory interpretation is a question of law that this court reviews de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17337 - 2017-09-21
of these two statutes. ¶10 Statutory interpretation is a question of law that this court reviews de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17337 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
rejected Free’s claim of prosecutorial misconduct because the instances were “of such de minimus effect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=67962 - 2014-09-15
rejected Free’s claim of prosecutorial misconduct because the instances were “of such de minimus effect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=67962 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Frontsheet
are affirmed unless clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=265072 - 2020-06-23
are affirmed unless clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=265072 - 2020-06-23