Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21091 - 21100 of 98406 for court records search online.
Search results 21091 - 21100 of 98406 for court records search online.
COURT OF APPEALS
on the day of the incident. These record facts support the court’s finding that Preston caused bodily injury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82387 - 2012-05-15
on the day of the incident. These record facts support the court’s finding that Preston caused bodily injury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82387 - 2012-05-15
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 7, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41629 - 2009-10-06
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 7, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41629 - 2009-10-06
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 19, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36522 - 2009-05-18
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 19, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36522 - 2009-05-18
COURT OF APPEALS
. The record shows, however, that Hamilton filed the motion before the circuit court held the April 9 hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35017 - 2008-12-29
. The record shows, however, that Hamilton filed the motion before the circuit court held the April 9 hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35017 - 2008-12-29
COURT OF APPEALS
sought clarification of the record because the circuit court’s decision on the motion did not address
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34268 - 2008-10-14
sought clarification of the record because the circuit court’s decision on the motion did not address
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34268 - 2008-10-14
COURT OF APPEALS
as the court’s assessment is based on facts of record, not on unfounded assumptions. Id. ¶13 Here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43221 - 2009-11-10
as the court’s assessment is based on facts of record, not on unfounded assumptions. Id. ¶13 Here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43221 - 2009-11-10
COURT OF APPEALS
is appropriate.” Id. ¶9 Unlike Ogden, the record in this case does not demonstrate that the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43710 - 2009-11-18
is appropriate.” Id. ¶9 Unlike Ogden, the record in this case does not demonstrate that the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43710 - 2009-11-18
COURT OF APPEALS
that the circuit court asked Williams on the record if he had reviewed the guilty plea questionnaire with his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114894 - 2014-06-23
that the circuit court asked Williams on the record if he had reviewed the guilty plea questionnaire with his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114894 - 2014-06-23
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 12, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86804 - 2012-09-11
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 12, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86804 - 2012-09-11
COURT OF APPEALS
was not read into the record or put in writing. The trial court denied Fischer’s motion to dismiss the OWI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28620 - 2007-04-03
was not read into the record or put in writing. The trial court denied Fischer’s motion to dismiss the OWI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28620 - 2007-04-03