Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21091 - 21100 of 29821 for des.
Search results 21091 - 21100 of 29821 for des.
Steve Berington v. Wausau Underwriters Insurance Co.
of claim preclusion to a given set of facts is a question of law that we review de novo. Northern States
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10045 - 2005-03-31
of claim preclusion to a given set of facts is a question of law that we review de novo. Northern States
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10045 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
legal standard is a question of law which we review de novo.” Ide v. LIRC, 224 Wis. 2d 159, 166, 589
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70216 - 2011-08-24
legal standard is a question of law which we review de novo.” Ide v. LIRC, 224 Wis. 2d 159, 166, 589
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70216 - 2011-08-24
COURT OF APPEALS
on summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. M & I First Nat’l Bank v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63774 - 2011-05-10
on summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. M & I First Nat’l Bank v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63774 - 2011-05-10
[PDF]
WI APP 31
de novo. See Century Fence Co. v. American Sewer Servs., Inc., 2021 WI App 75, ¶8, 399 Wis. 2d 742
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=792437 - 2024-06-20
de novo. See Century Fence Co. v. American Sewer Servs., Inc., 2021 WI App 75, ¶8, 399 Wis. 2d 742
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=792437 - 2024-06-20
COURT OF APPEALS
must interpret and apply statutes to undisputed facts, a question of law for our de novo review. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31090 - 2007-12-05
must interpret and apply statutes to undisputed facts, a question of law for our de novo review. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31090 - 2007-12-05
Kenneth Onapolis v. State
for forgery and theft. He was then placed on parole. He claims that the “de facto offense” for which he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24886 - 2006-05-30
for forgery and theft. He was then placed on parole. He claims that the “de facto offense” for which he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24886 - 2006-05-30
Shane M. Heimerl v. Waverly Beach, Inc.
We review a trial court’s grant or denial of summary judgment de novo. Waters v. United States Fid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6320 - 2005-03-31
We review a trial court’s grant or denial of summary judgment de novo. Waters v. United States Fid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6320 - 2005-03-31
State v. Shuron C. Davis
review de novo.” Id., 201 Wis. 2d at 310, 548 N.W.2d at 53. If, however, “‘the defendant fails
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4789 - 2005-03-31
review de novo.” Id., 201 Wis. 2d at 310, 548 N.W.2d at 53. If, however, “‘the defendant fails
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4789 - 2005-03-31
Ronald C. Kleutgen v. Robert A. McFadyen, Jr.
significance of those facts, however, is a question of law, which we review de novo. Applied here, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20079 - 2005-11-06
significance of those facts, however, is a question of law, which we review de novo. Applied here, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20079 - 2005-11-06
COURT OF APPEALS
to a fair trial and raises a question of law that we review de novo. See id. ¶14 We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81333 - 2012-04-17
to a fair trial and raises a question of law that we review de novo. See id. ¶14 We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81333 - 2012-04-17