Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2111 - 2120 of 63760 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 2111 - 2120 of 63760 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
2021AP001450 - Response of Wisconsin Legislature to Hunter Intervenors Motion for Relief from
’ MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT Counsel Listed on Following Page FILED 01-29-2024 CLERK
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1450_012924legisresponse.pdf - 2024-01-30
’ MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT Counsel Listed on Following Page FILED 01-29-2024 CLERK
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1450_012924legisresponse.pdf - 2024-01-30
State v. Barbara A. Buettner
). A prisoner in custody under sentence of a court may bring a motion under § 974.06(1), and such a motion may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12348 - 2005-03-31
). A prisoner in custody under sentence of a court may bring a motion under § 974.06(1), and such a motion may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12348 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Barbara A. Buettner
in custody under sentence of a court may bring a motion under § 974.06(1), and such a motion may be made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12348 - 2017-09-21
in custody under sentence of a court may bring a motion under § 974.06(1), and such a motion may be made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12348 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Marcella Schetter v. Ernie Von Schledorn Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.
name or custody remained marital assets for purposes of the equal division of the parties’ estate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10508 - 2017-09-20
name or custody remained marital assets for purposes of the equal division of the parties’ estate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10508 - 2017-09-20
Marcella Schetter v. Ernie Von Schledorn Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.
by Marcella to her sole name or custody remained marital assets for purposes of the equal division
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10508 - 2005-03-31
by Marcella to her sole name or custody remained marital assets for purposes of the equal division
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10508 - 2005-03-31
State v. Veldee T. Banks
spread among the three co-defendants.[1] Prior to trial, Banks’s motions to sever defendants and charges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6070 - 2005-03-31
spread among the three co-defendants.[1] Prior to trial, Banks’s motions to sever defendants and charges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6070 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. He remained in custody for 180 days, until the circuit court granted the State’s motion to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78232 - 2012-02-21
. He remained in custody for 180 days, until the circuit court granted the State’s motion to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78232 - 2012-02-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, the residence is to be equitably partitioned.” The court determined that “a general Watts joint venture
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145492 - 2017-09-21
, the residence is to be equitably partitioned.” The court determined that “a general Watts joint venture
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145492 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
partitioned.” The court determined that “a general Watts joint venture cannot be sustained in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145492 - 2015-07-30
partitioned.” The court determined that “a general Watts joint venture cannot be sustained in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145492 - 2015-07-30
[PDF]
NOTICE
postconviction motion for sentence credit; (2) an order dated May 2, 2006
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27382 - 2014-09-15
postconviction motion for sentence credit; (2) an order dated May 2, 2006
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27382 - 2014-09-15