Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2111 - 2120 of 4800 for WA 0821 7001 0763 (FORTRESS) Pintu Baja Fortress Double Talun Blitar.
Search results 2111 - 2120 of 4800 for WA 0821 7001 0763 (FORTRESS) Pintu Baja Fortress Double Talun Blitar.
COURT OF APPEALS
period constituted double jeopardy. The circuit denied the motion. Hudson appealed and we affirmed. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31051 - 2007-12-03
period constituted double jeopardy. The circuit denied the motion. Hudson appealed and we affirmed. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31051 - 2007-12-03
COURT OF APPEALS
endangering safety were multiplicitous and therefore violated double jeopardy. The circuit court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54717 - 2010-09-20
endangering safety were multiplicitous and therefore violated double jeopardy. The circuit court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54717 - 2010-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
the judgment of conviction and postconviction order, rejecting Arthur’s claims of Double Jeopardy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35506 - 2014-09-15
the judgment of conviction and postconviction order, rejecting Arthur’s claims of Double Jeopardy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35506 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
unpreparedness, giving as one example the necessity for a final pretrial in October 2013, a “double final
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190992 - 2017-09-21
unpreparedness, giving as one example the necessity for a final pretrial in October 2013, a “double final
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190992 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jackie Green
is attempting to claim double credit, that he is not entitled to forty-one days’ credit and that Green “has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16207 - 2017-09-21
is attempting to claim double credit, that he is not entitled to forty-one days’ credit and that Green “has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16207 - 2017-09-21
Kathy Willis-Fulani v. Phil Kingston
.2d 627, 647, 492 N.W.2d 633, 642 (Ct. App. 1992). Willis-Fulani next argues that her double jeopardy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11113 - 2005-03-31
.2d 627, 647, 492 N.W.2d 633, 642 (Ct. App. 1992). Willis-Fulani next argues that her double jeopardy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11113 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
a double or triple recovery. Ultimately, based on its reading of the stipulation, the court dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72589 - 2011-10-24
a double or triple recovery. Ultimately, based on its reading of the stipulation, the court dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72589 - 2011-10-24
Debbra MacDonald v. American National Property and Casualty Company
was partially based on the court’s interpretation of Stephens’ deposition that contained a double-negative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2382 - 2005-03-31
was partially based on the court’s interpretation of Stephens’ deposition that contained a double-negative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2382 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Timothy V. Montgomery
counts violated the double jeopardy clause. This claim was not raised in the trial court and therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20547 - 2017-09-21
counts violated the double jeopardy clause. This claim was not raised in the trial court and therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20547 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
had not ordered a withheld sentence at the original sentencing hearing. 2 He also raised double
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109264 - 2017-09-21
had not ordered a withheld sentence at the original sentencing hearing. 2 He also raised double
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109264 - 2017-09-21