Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2111 - 2120 of 3972 for davi.
Search results 2111 - 2120 of 3972 for davi.
_WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS
. 06-28-2011 Affirmed 2011AP000320 State v. Blair T. Davis
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69447 - 2011-08-08
. 06-28-2011 Affirmed 2011AP000320 State v. Blair T. Davis
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69447 - 2011-08-08
COURT OF APPEALS
of the circuit court for Waukesha County: j. mac davis, Judge. Affirmed. Before Brown, C.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98455 - 2013-06-25
of the circuit court for Waukesha County: j. mac davis, Judge. Affirmed. Before Brown, C.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98455 - 2013-06-25
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
right to present a defense does not entitle him to present evidence that is irrelevant. See Davis v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15523 - 2005-03-31
right to present a defense does not entitle him to present evidence that is irrelevant. See Davis v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15523 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
right to present a defense does not entitle him to present evidence that is irrelevant. See Davis v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15521 - 2005-03-31
right to present a defense does not entitle him to present evidence that is irrelevant. See Davis v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15521 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
right to present a defense does not entitle him to present evidence that is irrelevant. See Davis v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15520 - 2005-03-31
right to present a defense does not entitle him to present evidence that is irrelevant. See Davis v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15520 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
right to present a defense does not entitle him to present evidence that is irrelevant. See Davis v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15522 - 2005-03-31
right to present a defense does not entitle him to present evidence that is irrelevant. See Davis v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15522 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the circumstances.’” State v. Davis, 2005 WI App 98, ¶15, 281 Wis. 2d 118, 698 N.W.2d 823 (citation omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139077 - 2015-04-07
the circumstances.’” State v. Davis, 2005 WI App 98, ¶15, 281 Wis. 2d 118, 698 N.W.2d 823 (citation omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139077 - 2015-04-07
COURT OF APPEALS
and whether a sentence was excessive are virtually identical in Wisconsin.” State v. Davis, 2005 WI App 98
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55648 - 2010-10-18
and whether a sentence was excessive are virtually identical in Wisconsin.” State v. Davis, 2005 WI App 98
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55648 - 2010-10-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. #2017CF109) Before Neubauer, C.J., Gundrum and Davis, JJ. Summary disposition orders may
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=378950 - 2021-06-23
. #2017CF109) Before Neubauer, C.J., Gundrum and Davis, JJ. Summary disposition orders may
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=378950 - 2021-06-23
[PDF]
NOTICE
of the circuit court for Waukesha County: J. MAC DAVIS, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 BROWN, C.J.1 The Waukesha
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31212 - 2014-09-15
of the circuit court for Waukesha County: J. MAC DAVIS, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 BROWN, C.J.1 The Waukesha
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31212 - 2014-09-15