Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2111 - 2120 of 29823 for des.
Search results 2111 - 2120 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
WI App 23
review a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. Munger v. Seehafer, 2016 WI App 89, ¶46
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=775494 - 2024-05-08
review a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. Munger v. Seehafer, 2016 WI App 89, ¶46
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=775494 - 2024-05-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a claim for relief presents a question of law, which we review de novo.” Cook v. Public Storage, Inc
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913864 - 2025-02-13
a claim for relief presents a question of law, which we review de novo.” Cook v. Public Storage, Inc
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913864 - 2025-02-13
Sybil Drabek v. Floyd Rasmussen
that we review de novo. See Hunzinger Constr. Co. v. Granite Resources Corp., 196 Wis.2d 327, 332, 538
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12402 - 2005-03-31
that we review de novo. See Hunzinger Constr. Co. v. Granite Resources Corp., 196 Wis.2d 327, 332, 538
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12402 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Avery T., Jr.
or defense materially violated the spirit of the plea agreement is reviewed under a de novo standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8592 - 2017-09-19
or defense materially violated the spirit of the plea agreement is reviewed under a de novo standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8592 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Marcus A. Farina
, the implied consent statute. Interpretation of a statute is a question of law which this court reviews de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2422 - 2017-09-19
, the implied consent statute. Interpretation of a statute is a question of law which this court reviews de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2422 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 LUNDSTEN, J. 1 Travanti Schmidt appeals a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121951 - 2014-09-18
P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 LUNDSTEN, J. 1 Travanti Schmidt appeals a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121951 - 2014-09-18
[PDF]
State v. Charlotte Kotlov
review de novo, Sanchez, 201 Wis.2d at 236, 548 N.W.2d at 76. NO. 96-2911-CR 5 The lawyer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11545 - 2017-09-19
review de novo, Sanchez, 201 Wis.2d at 236, 548 N.W.2d at 76. NO. 96-2911-CR 5 The lawyer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11545 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
James Munroe v. Kenneth Morgan
(1993) (citation omitted). We review the legal sufficiency of the complaint de novo, without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11027 - 2017-09-19
(1993) (citation omitted). We review the legal sufficiency of the complaint de novo, without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11027 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
of the circuit court for Grant County: robert p. van de hey, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 LUNDSTEN, J.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45733 - 2010-01-13
of the circuit court for Grant County: robert p. van de hey, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 LUNDSTEN, J.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45733 - 2010-01-13
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Kimberly A. Theobald
erroneous but conclusions of law are reviewed on a de novo basis. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16794 - 2005-03-31
erroneous but conclusions of law are reviewed on a de novo basis. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16794 - 2005-03-31