Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21101 - 21110 of 63979 for records/1000.
Search results 21101 - 21110 of 63979 for records/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
from judgment. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=124594 - 2017-09-21
from judgment. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=124594 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194041 - 2017-09-21
Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194041 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Edward C. Brandau
and that Brandau was not prejudiced by their failure to raise the speedy trial issue because the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10139 - 2017-09-19
and that Brandau was not prejudiced by their failure to raise the speedy trial issue because the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10139 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=976934 - 2025-07-01
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=976934 - 2025-07-01
CA Blank Order
judgment. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=124594 - 2014-10-21
judgment. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=124594 - 2014-10-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
Andres. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference No. 2011AP2947
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91890 - 2014-09-15
Andres. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference No. 2011AP2947
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91890 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
(2015-16). 1 After reviewing the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206305 - 2017-12-26
(2015-16). 1 After reviewing the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206305 - 2017-12-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the record and counsel’s report, we conclude that there are no issues with arguable merit for appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=198171 - 2017-10-25
the record and counsel’s report, we conclude that there are no issues with arguable merit for appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=198171 - 2017-10-25
[PDF]
State v. James Gulley
to trial. It is important to note that the State did not have any written record of Shipp’s statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10535 - 2017-09-20
to trial. It is important to note that the State did not have any written record of Shipp’s statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10535 - 2017-09-20
Richard G. Bean v. Marilyn J. Bean
, reasoned decision and applies the correct legal standards to the facts of record. See id. The dual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2320 - 2005-03-31
, reasoned decision and applies the correct legal standards to the facts of record. See id. The dual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2320 - 2005-03-31