Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21111 - 21120 of 69380 for as he.
Search results 21111 - 21120 of 69380 for as he.
State v. Daniel J. Balint
, Stats. Balint claims he was denied his constitutional right to counsel. Because there is nothing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9266 - 2005-03-31
, Stats. Balint claims he was denied his constitutional right to counsel. Because there is nothing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9266 - 2005-03-31
Dennis Makeeff v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
that he was disabled by a work-related injury. See Leist v. LIRC, 183 Wis. 2d 450, 457 515 N.W.2d 268
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3342 - 2005-03-31
that he was disabled by a work-related injury. See Leist v. LIRC, 183 Wis. 2d 450, 457 515 N.W.2d 268
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3342 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Daniel W. Harr
the admission of such evidence. Harr discusses how the prosecution used that evidence, but he does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11822 - 2017-09-21
the admission of such evidence. Harr discusses how the prosecution used that evidence, but he does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11822 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Robert Garel
a prior order placing him on probation, claiming this could not be done because he was then on parole
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11821 - 2017-09-21
a prior order placing him on probation, claiming this could not be done because he was then on parole
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11821 - 2017-09-21
State v. Hiram Johnson
he pled guilty to operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated, third offense, contrary to §§ 346.63(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11192 - 2005-03-31
he pled guilty to operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated, third offense, contrary to §§ 346.63(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11192 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Floyd Hipsher
denying his WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2003-04) postconviction motion in which he argued that the prosecutor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20651 - 2017-09-21
denying his WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2003-04) postconviction motion in which he argued that the prosecutor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20651 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
in possession of a firearm, and hiding a corpse. He also appeals an order denying his motion to withdraw his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53420 - 2010-08-16
in possession of a firearm, and hiding a corpse. He also appeals an order denying his motion to withdraw his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53420 - 2010-08-16
[PDF]
State v. Ray L. White
. CURLEY, J.2 Ray L. White appeals from a judgment of conviction entered after he pleaded no contest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12793 - 2017-09-21
. CURLEY, J.2 Ray L. White appeals from a judgment of conviction entered after he pleaded no contest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12793 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
because when he was charged with forgery-uttering under Wis. Stat. § 943.38(2) (2001-02)[1] the crime had
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91341 - 2013-01-08
because when he was charged with forgery-uttering under Wis. Stat. § 943.38(2) (2001-02)[1] the crime had
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91341 - 2013-01-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that he is entitled to sentence modification based on a “new factor”—his termination from the Substance
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=568308 - 2022-09-20
that he is entitled to sentence modification based on a “new factor”—his termination from the Substance
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=568308 - 2022-09-20