Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21111 - 21120 of 64730 for b's.
Search results 21111 - 21120 of 64730 for b's.
Kenneth L. Grover v.
with his client, in violation of SCR 20:1.5(b),[1] in that he did not adequately explain the basis on which
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16983 - 2005-03-31
with his client, in violation of SCR 20:1.5(b),[1] in that he did not adequately explain the basis on which
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16983 - 2005-03-31
State v. Feleipe Harris
if convicted. (b) Make such inquiry as satisfies it that the defendant in fact committed the crime charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8629 - 2005-03-31
if convicted. (b) Make such inquiry as satisfies it that the defendant in fact committed the crime charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8629 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Pervis Merritt
not extend the time for filing the notice of appeal. Section 974.06(6); RULE 809.82(2)(b), STATS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9907 - 2017-09-19
not extend the time for filing the notice of appeal. Section 974.06(6); RULE 809.82(2)(b), STATS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9907 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Allen Tony Davis
failure to impeach Metz with the rules-violation report. B. Davis’s Request to Represent Himself
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15911 - 2017-09-21
failure to impeach Metz with the rules-violation report. B. Davis’s Request to Represent Himself
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15911 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of or has been used in the commission of any crime[.]” Sec. 968.13(1)(b). The person seeking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=694036 - 2023-08-23
of or has been used in the commission of any crime[.]” Sec. 968.13(1)(b). The person seeking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=694036 - 2023-08-23
[PDF]
NOTICE
This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(b). All references to the Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28923 - 2014-09-15
This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(b). All references to the Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28923 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is not illegal. See WIS. STAT. § 968.31(2)(b) (creating an exception to the general prohibition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=154142 - 2017-09-21
is not illegal. See WIS. STAT. § 968.31(2)(b) (creating an exception to the general prohibition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=154142 - 2017-09-21
State v. Michael F. Howard
subsequent proceedings in the case in both the circuit and appellate courts.”). We discern no error. B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5394 - 2005-03-31
subsequent proceedings in the case in both the circuit and appellate courts.”). We discern no error. B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5394 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Duane P. Reusch v. Mark W. Roob
809.23(1)(b)4. 2 In their responsive brief on appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3409 - 2017-09-19
809.23(1)(b)4. 2 In their responsive brief on appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3409 - 2017-09-19
Fond du Lac County v. Elizabeth M.P.
. The County argues that Elizabeth’s request for a postponement under § 51.20(10)(e), Stats., “[b]y implication
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12270 - 2005-03-31
. The County argues that Elizabeth’s request for a postponement under § 51.20(10)(e), Stats., “[b]y implication
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12270 - 2005-03-31