Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21111 - 21120 of 29817 for des.
Search results 21111 - 21120 of 29817 for des.
Keith Love v. John Eversman
judgment is well known. In an appeal from the entry of summary judgment, this court reviews the record de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13772 - 2005-03-31
judgment is well known. In an appeal from the entry of summary judgment, this court reviews the record de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13772 - 2005-03-31
Steve Berington v. Wausau Underwriters Insurance Co.
of claim preclusion to a given set of facts is a question of law that we review de novo. Northern States
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10045 - 2005-03-31
of claim preclusion to a given set of facts is a question of law that we review de novo. Northern States
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10045 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of constitutional fact, which this court reviews de novo. See Pulizzano, 155 Wis. 2d at 648. ¶5 Taylor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243422 - 2019-07-10
of constitutional fact, which this court reviews de novo. See Pulizzano, 155 Wis. 2d at 648. ¶5 Taylor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243422 - 2019-07-10
COURT OF APPEALS
legal standard is a question of law which we review de novo.” Ide v. LIRC, 224 Wis. 2d 159, 166, 589
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70216 - 2011-08-24
legal standard is a question of law which we review de novo.” Ide v. LIRC, 224 Wis. 2d 159, 166, 589
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70216 - 2011-08-24
COURT OF APPEALS
on summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. M & I First Nat’l Bank v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63774 - 2011-05-10
on summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. M & I First Nat’l Bank v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63774 - 2011-05-10
[PDF]
WI APP 31
de novo. See Century Fence Co. v. American Sewer Servs., Inc., 2021 WI App 75, ¶8, 399 Wis. 2d 742
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=792437 - 2024-06-20
de novo. See Century Fence Co. v. American Sewer Servs., Inc., 2021 WI App 75, ¶8, 399 Wis. 2d 742
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=792437 - 2024-06-20
[PDF]
State v. James B.
., 179 Wis. 2d at 150, 507 N.W.2d at 107. We review de novo, however, whether the trial court has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6190 - 2017-09-19
., 179 Wis. 2d at 150, 507 N.W.2d at 107. We review de novo, however, whether the trial court has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6190 - 2017-09-19
William C. Frazier v. Jeffrey W. Senglaub
. Senglaub appeals. SUMMARY JUDGMENT ¶11 This court reviews summary judgments de novo, employing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19977 - 2005-10-18
. Senglaub appeals. SUMMARY JUDGMENT ¶11 This court reviews summary judgments de novo, employing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19977 - 2005-10-18
COURT OF APPEALS
must interpret and apply statutes to undisputed facts, a question of law for our de novo review. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31090 - 2007-12-05
must interpret and apply statutes to undisputed facts, a question of law for our de novo review. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31090 - 2007-12-05
Kenneth Onapolis v. State
for forgery and theft. He was then placed on parole. He claims that the “de facto offense” for which he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24886 - 2006-05-30
for forgery and theft. He was then placed on parole. He claims that the “de facto offense” for which he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24886 - 2006-05-30