Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21111 - 21120 of 68274 for did.

[PDF] State v. Chadrick B. Thompson
for appeal, we affirm the judgments of conviction. At the sentencing hearing, Thompson did not object
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11014 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Case of the month - March 2008
was in the form the open records law required and did not require the creation of a new record. The trial court
/courts/resources/teacher/casemonth/docs/march08.pdf - 2008-03-10

[PDF] Case of the month - November 2012
floor slab cracked and a portion deflected downward, as did a portion of the second floor and roof
/courts/resources/teacher/casemonth/docs/nov12.pdf - 2012-11-08

[PDF] CA Blank Order
to others—although the circuit court did not refer to this standard in its oral decision or check
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=963012 - 2025-05-30

[PDF] State v. Ronald L. Mikkelson
court did not erroneously exercise its discretion and, therefore we affirm. Mikkelson pleaded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14840 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Jerry Saenz v. Gary McCaughtry
, 429 N.W.2d 81, 82 (Ct. App. 1988). The committee could reasonably reach the conclusion that it did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14336 - 2014-09-15

John C. Koshick v. State
that dismissal with prejudice was being sought, because the defendants’ motion to dismiss on the merits did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3241 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
to others—although the circuit court did not refer to this standard in its oral decision or check
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=963012 - 2025-05-30

[PDF] State v. James E. Jones
. State v. Meyer, 150 Wis.2d 603, 604, 442 N.W.2d 483, 484 (Ct. App. 1989). He did not do so. He did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11206 - 2017-09-19

Ronald S. Schilling v. Patricia Goodrich
provisions to persons serving life sentences did not violate the ex post facto clause. Burrus v. Goodrich
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3048 - 2005-03-31