Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21121 - 21130 of 30242 for de.
Search results 21121 - 21130 of 30242 for de.
[PDF]
Buena Vista Shores Marina v. Michael B. Poston
judgment. No. 2005AP2036 5 DISCUSSION ¶8 We review summary judgment de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25628 - 2017-09-21
judgment. No. 2005AP2036 5 DISCUSSION ¶8 We review summary judgment de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25628 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). We review this question de novo. State v. Giminski, 2001 WI App 211, ¶11, 247 Wis. 2d 750, 634
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191966 - 2017-09-21
). We review this question de novo. State v. Giminski, 2001 WI App 211, ¶11, 247 Wis. 2d 750, 634
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191966 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Elmer J. K.
interpretation. Construction of a contract is a question of law we review de novo. Gunka v. Consolidated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14280 - 2014-09-15
interpretation. Construction of a contract is a question of law we review de novo. Gunka v. Consolidated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14280 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to entitle the defendant to an evidentiary hearing is reviewed de novo. See id., ¶¶30-31. ¶9 The circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93295 - 2014-09-15
to entitle the defendant to an evidentiary hearing is reviewed de novo. See id., ¶¶30-31. ¶9 The circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93295 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
, whether the facts entitle the defendant to withdraw his plea is a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96281 - 2013-05-01
, whether the facts entitle the defendant to withdraw his plea is a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96281 - 2013-05-01
COURT OF APPEALS
Regardless, we review de novo whether Victoria-Vazquez has demonstrated that a new factor exists. See Harbor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100035 - 2013-07-29
Regardless, we review de novo whether Victoria-Vazquez has demonstrated that a new factor exists. See Harbor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100035 - 2013-07-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
(citation omitted). We consider de novo whether plain error has occurred, State v. Bell, 2018 WI 28, ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=721953 - 2023-11-01
(citation omitted). We consider de novo whether plain error has occurred, State v. Bell, 2018 WI 28, ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=721953 - 2023-11-01
[PDF]
NOTICE
a deed’s language is ambiguous is a question of law that we review de novo. Wisconsin Pub. Serv. Corp. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43131 - 2014-09-15
a deed’s language is ambiguous is a question of law that we review de novo. Wisconsin Pub. Serv. Corp. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43131 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Frontsheet
a referee's findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184689 - 2017-09-21
a referee's findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184689 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
it is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. State v. Willett, 2000 WI App 212, ¶4, 238 Wis. 2d 621
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34444 - 2008-11-04
it is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. State v. Willett, 2000 WI App 212, ¶4, 238 Wis. 2d 621
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34444 - 2008-11-04