Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21121 - 21130 of 68544 for did.
Search results 21121 - 21130 of 68544 for did.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
’ recommendations and that he did not otherwise know this information. Following an evidentiary hearing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135555 - 2017-09-21
’ recommendations and that he did not otherwise know this information. Following an evidentiary hearing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135555 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. 2025AP321-CR 2025AP322-CR 2025AP323-CR 3 on her letter, but concluded that did not excuse her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1077740 - 2026-02-17
. 2025AP321-CR 2025AP322-CR 2025AP323-CR 3 on her letter, but concluded that did not excuse her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1077740 - 2026-02-17
State v. Maurice L. Gladney
happen. Jermaine also admitted that he did not say anything about being punched or choked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14982 - 2005-03-31
happen. Jermaine also admitted that he did not say anything about being punched or choked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14982 - 2005-03-31
State v. James R. Brownson
of the computer, but a purchaser, and that he did not intentionally fail to return rental property because he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11911 - 2005-03-31
of the computer, but a purchaser, and that he did not intentionally fail to return rental property because he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11911 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Barbara L. Davis v. James G. Davis
. No. 00-3107-FT 3 ¶5 The trial court did not explain its decision setting child support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3278 - 2017-09-19
. No. 00-3107-FT 3 ¶5 The trial court did not explain its decision setting child support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3278 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
the postconviction motion. The court’s denial of substitution was proper because Bennett did not have a right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113196 - 2012-05-28
the postconviction motion. The court’s denial of substitution was proper because Bennett did not have a right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113196 - 2012-05-28
State v. David L. Canedy
an opportunity to explain why he did not earlier raise the ineffectiveness issue. State v. Canedy, No. 93‑2987
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10351 - 2005-03-31
an opportunity to explain why he did not earlier raise the ineffectiveness issue. State v. Canedy, No. 93‑2987
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10351 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
the public. The court did not consider improper factors, and reached a reasonable result
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96518 - 2013-05-05
the public. The court did not consider improper factors, and reached a reasonable result
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96518 - 2013-05-05
CA Blank Order
. Stat. § 806.07(1)(h). It did so because (1) it did not find an inconsistency between the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97884 - 2013-06-11
. Stat. § 806.07(1)(h). It did so because (1) it did not find an inconsistency between the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97884 - 2013-06-11
COURT OF APPEALS
in jail and fined her $2,119.50. Because the jury did not find that Wilson’s BAC was greater than .17
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32998 - 2005-04-11
in jail and fined her $2,119.50. Because the jury did not find that Wilson’s BAC was greater than .17
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32998 - 2005-04-11