Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21121 - 21130 of 70183 for his.
Search results 21121 - 21130 of 70183 for his.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Carpenter, pro se, appeals the orders denying his various requests for postconviction relief. Based upon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231409 - 2018-12-21
Carpenter, pro se, appeals the orders denying his various requests for postconviction relief. Based upon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231409 - 2018-12-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and two counts of incest, and from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Dancel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210679 - 2018-04-11
and two counts of incest, and from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Dancel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210679 - 2018-04-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
denying his motion for postconviction relief. Anderson contends the circuit court erred in denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244116 - 2019-07-23
denying his motion for postconviction relief. Anderson contends the circuit court erred in denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244116 - 2019-07-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. His appellate counsel has filed a no-merit report pursuant to WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2013-14), 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177051 - 2017-09-21
. His appellate counsel has filed a no-merit report pursuant to WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2013-14), 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177051 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jack L. Cox
in this action. After Cox left his family, Carol obtained a judgment of divorce from him in absentia. As part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10135 - 2017-09-19
in this action. After Cox left his family, Carol obtained a judgment of divorce from him in absentia. As part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10135 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. David E. Sanders
. § 946.41(1), and from an order denying his postconviction motions. Sanders contends that he is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5770 - 2017-09-19
. § 946.41(1), and from an order denying his postconviction motions. Sanders contends that he is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5770 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
).1 He also appeals from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Solis’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251830 - 2019-12-26
).1 He also appeals from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Solis’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251830 - 2019-12-26
09AP2667 State v. Dakota A.K.
of a delinquency petition because he was not provided all discovery material before his plea hearing. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48272 - 2010-03-23
of a delinquency petition because he was not provided all discovery material before his plea hearing. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48272 - 2010-03-23
State v. William S. Cherry
denying him postconviction relief. Cherry argues that the circuit court erroneously denied his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4389 - 2010-06-08
denying him postconviction relief. Cherry argues that the circuit court erroneously denied his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4389 - 2010-06-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
2 Whitehead argued that he was entitled to default judgment in his favor because Indianhead
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=273945 - 2020-07-30
2 Whitehead argued that he was entitled to default judgment in his favor because Indianhead
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=273945 - 2020-07-30