Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21121 - 21130 of 64056 for records/1000.
Search results 21121 - 21130 of 64056 for records/1000.
Marathon County v. Vicki L.B.
there was an untimely filing of a request for a jury trial. The record does not reflect that Vicki instructed counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12312 - 2005-03-31
there was an untimely filing of a request for a jury trial. The record does not reflect that Vicki instructed counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12312 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, and he has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=798545 - 2024-05-07
, and he has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=798545 - 2024-05-07
State v. Dean C. Trepanier
difficulties” and “significant criminal record aside from [OWI-5th].” The court continued: In terms of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26060 - 2006-07-31
difficulties” and “significant criminal record aside from [OWI-5th].” The court continued: In terms of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26060 - 2006-07-31
CA Blank Order
of the record, no issue of arguable merit appears. The petition alleged that Karen is mentally ill and a proper
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95445 - 2013-04-15
of the record, no issue of arguable merit appears. The petition alleged that Karen is mentally ill and a proper
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95445 - 2013-04-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). J.L. has not responded. After reviewing the Record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=918447 - 2025-02-26
and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). J.L. has not responded. After reviewing the Record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=918447 - 2025-02-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
court’s independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=718182 - 2023-10-24
court’s independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=718182 - 2023-10-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
court’s independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=718182 - 2023-10-24
court’s independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=718182 - 2023-10-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we agree with counsel’s assessment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207414 - 2018-01-19
the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we agree with counsel’s assessment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207414 - 2018-01-19
[PDF]
State v. Ollie B. LeFlore
, intelligently and voluntarily waived his right to counsel and is competent to proceed pro se. Id. The record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14211 - 2014-09-15
, intelligently and voluntarily waived his right to counsel and is competent to proceed pro se. Id. The record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14211 - 2014-09-15
State v. Michael S. Holmes
). Holmes filed a response. This court has independently reviewed the record, and considered the no merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10009 - 2005-03-31
). Holmes filed a response. This court has independently reviewed the record, and considered the no merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10009 - 2005-03-31