Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21121 - 21130 of 64056 for records/1000.
Search results 21121 - 21130 of 64056 for records/1000.
Frontsheet
or its effect. ¶14 The personal representative's deed containing Attorney Roethe's changes was recorded
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48354 - 2010-03-23
or its effect. ¶14 The personal representative's deed containing Attorney Roethe's changes was recorded
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48354 - 2010-03-23
2008 WI App 77
not. It does not appear from the record that any of the three offered an explanation or a purpose for his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32352 - 2008-05-27
not. It does not appear from the record that any of the three offered an explanation or a purpose for his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32352 - 2008-05-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, counsel has filed a supplemental no-merit report. Upon our independent review of the entire record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=447213 - 2021-11-04
, counsel has filed a supplemental no-merit report. Upon our independent review of the entire record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=447213 - 2021-11-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
2 response. Having independently reviewed the entire record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1084626 - 2026-03-03
2 response. Having independently reviewed the entire record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1084626 - 2026-03-03
CA Blank Order
elected not to do so. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109121 - 2014-03-18
elected not to do so. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109121 - 2014-03-18
State v. Robert T. Langston
.[1] Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11318 - 2005-03-31
.[1] Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11318 - 2005-03-31
State v. Keith D. McEvoy
inadequate; and (2) the sentence was excessive. On review of the record, this court is satisfied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14641 - 2005-03-31
inadequate; and (2) the sentence was excessive. On review of the record, this court is satisfied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14641 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1066767 - 2026-01-23
petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1066767 - 2026-01-23
Waterford Bank v. Kevin J. Kimball
in the summary judgment record, we reverse the judgment and remand the matter for further proceedings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10116 - 2005-03-31
in the summary judgment record, we reverse the judgment and remand the matter for further proceedings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10116 - 2005-03-31
Michael Solomon v. Gary R. McCaughtry
consider the following: (1) The inmate’s overall disciplinary record, especially during the last year; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12940 - 2005-03-31
consider the following: (1) The inmate’s overall disciplinary record, especially during the last year; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12940 - 2005-03-31