Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21131 - 21140 of 29810 for des.
Search results 21131 - 21140 of 29810 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to believe the previous amount of child support was de minimis, going so far as to remark that under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=903882 - 2025-01-22
to believe the previous amount of child support was de minimis, going so far as to remark that under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=903882 - 2025-01-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, ¶16. This is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. Here, the circuit court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=936653 - 2025-04-03
, ¶16. This is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. Here, the circuit court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=936653 - 2025-04-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the circuit court’s factual findings unless they are clearly erroneous, but we review de novo whether those
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216043 - 2018-07-24
the circuit court’s factual findings unless they are clearly erroneous, but we review de novo whether those
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216043 - 2018-07-24
[PDF]
City of Watertown v. Jeffrey Busshardt
of the resisting charge and asked for a de novo hearing under § 800.14(4), STATS. Busshardt argues, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9131 - 2017-09-19
of the resisting charge and asked for a de novo hearing under § 800.14(4), STATS. Busshardt argues, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9131 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
clearly erroneous, we uphold the circuit court’s findings of fact, and we review de novo the application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247408 - 2019-12-12
clearly erroneous, we uphold the circuit court’s findings of fact, and we review de novo the application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247408 - 2019-12-12
COURT OF APPEALS
Regardless, we review de novo whether Victoria-Vazquez has demonstrated that a new factor exists. See Harbor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100035 - 2013-07-29
Regardless, we review de novo whether Victoria-Vazquez has demonstrated that a new factor exists. See Harbor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100035 - 2013-07-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court has personal jurisdiction over an out-of-state defendant is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172265 - 2017-09-21
court has personal jurisdiction over an out-of-state defendant is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172265 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment de novo, applying the same standards as the circuit court. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34103 - 2008-09-24
judgment de novo, applying the same standards as the circuit court. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34103 - 2008-09-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Magett, 2014 WI 67, ¶29, 355 Wis. 2d 617, 850 N.W.2d 42
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1064687 - 2026-01-21
is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Magett, 2014 WI 67, ¶29, 355 Wis. 2d 617, 850 N.W.2d 42
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1064687 - 2026-01-21
COURT OF APPEALS
to be a waiver/equitable estoppel basis. ¶14 We review summary judgment de novo. Pinter v. American Family
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99904 - 2013-07-25
to be a waiver/equitable estoppel basis. ¶14 We review summary judgment de novo. Pinter v. American Family
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99904 - 2013-07-25