Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21141 - 21150 of 30242 for de.
Search results 21141 - 21150 of 30242 for de.
Frontsheet
A referee's findings of fact are affirmed unless clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135152 - 2015-02-16
A referee's findings of fact are affirmed unless clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135152 - 2015-02-16
COURT OF APPEALS
was deficient and whether the deficient performance was prejudicial are questions of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47621 - 2010-03-03
was deficient and whether the deficient performance was prejudicial are questions of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47621 - 2010-03-03
State v. Joseph F. Jiles
). This presents a question of law that we review de novo. Id., 201 Wis. 2d at 310, 548 N.W.2d at 53.[5] ¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4841 - 2005-03-31
). This presents a question of law that we review de novo. Id., 201 Wis. 2d at 310, 548 N.W.2d at 53.[5] ¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4841 - 2005-03-31
Rule Construction, Ltd. v. Nicholas Ladopoulos
. Schuster v. Altenberg, 144 Wis.2d 223, 228, 424 N.W.2d 159, 161 (1988). Our review is de novo. We first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11909 - 2005-03-31
. Schuster v. Altenberg, 144 Wis.2d 223, 228, 424 N.W.2d 159, 161 (1988). Our review is de novo. We first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11909 - 2005-03-31
Brown County Department of Human Services v. Neung S.
the deficiency or prejudice prong is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See id. A. DIRECTED
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2204 - 2005-03-31
the deficiency or prejudice prong is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See id. A. DIRECTED
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2204 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Winnebago County Department of Health & Human Services v. Diane L.M.
. retroactively. Whether to retroactively apply the holding of a case is a question of law that we decide de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7628 - 2017-09-19
. retroactively. Whether to retroactively apply the holding of a case is a question of law that we decide de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7628 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
(citation omitted). We review de novo whether the circuit court properly denied a motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=470397 - 2022-01-11
(citation omitted). We review de novo whether the circuit court properly denied a motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=470397 - 2022-01-11
COURT OF APPEALS
and whether it prejudiced the parent are questions of law we review de novo. See id. ¶8 To prove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144662 - 2015-07-21
and whether it prejudiced the parent are questions of law we review de novo. See id. ¶8 To prove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144662 - 2015-07-21
2009 WI APP 30
’ counterclaims. DISCUSSION ¶8 We review summary judgments de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35621 - 2009-03-24
’ counterclaims. DISCUSSION ¶8 We review summary judgments de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35621 - 2009-03-24
[PDF]
Tamara S. Heibler v. Department of Workforce Development
of this issue must be de novo. The Department responds that we must accord its interpretations of WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3757 - 2017-09-19
of this issue must be de novo. The Department responds that we must accord its interpretations of WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3757 - 2017-09-19