Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21141 - 21150 of 29817 for des.
Search results 21141 - 21150 of 29817 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question for de novo review. Id., ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111914 - 2017-09-21
is a question for de novo review. Id., ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111914 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
challenges the conclusions the circuit court drew from those factual findings. This court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243907 - 2019-07-18
challenges the conclusions the circuit court drew from those factual findings. This court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243907 - 2019-07-18
State v. Eric Jason Smiley
it was prejudicial, are legal issues we review de novo. Id. 1. First Statement. ¶19 Smiley contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3586 - 2005-03-31
it was prejudicial, are legal issues we review de novo. Id. 1. First Statement. ¶19 Smiley contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3586 - 2005-03-31
Wayne A. Greenlee v. Rainbow Auction/Realty Co., Inc.
of law based on those facts, de novo. See Department of Revenue v. Exxon Corp., 90 Wis.2d 700, 713, 281
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12513 - 2005-03-31
of law based on those facts, de novo. See Department of Revenue v. Exxon Corp., 90 Wis.2d 700, 713, 281
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12513 - 2005-03-31
99-CV-208 Randal Bidstrup v. Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services
requires that we interpret and apply the administrative code, a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2698 - 2005-03-31
requires that we interpret and apply the administrative code, a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2698 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
statutes. Both are matters of law subject to de novo review. See State v. Jankowski, 173 Wis. 2d 522, 526
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84918 - 2012-08-28
statutes. Both are matters of law subject to de novo review. See State v. Jankowski, 173 Wis. 2d 522, 526
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84918 - 2012-08-28
COURT OF APPEALS
for Waukesha County: Linda M. van de water, Judge. Reversed. ¶1 NEUBAUER, P.J.[1] Jon Paul
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72163 - 2011-10-11
for Waukesha County: Linda M. van de water, Judge. Reversed. ¶1 NEUBAUER, P.J.[1] Jon Paul
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72163 - 2011-10-11
COURT OF APPEALS
factual findings to the legal standard is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72231 - 2011-10-12
factual findings to the legal standard is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72231 - 2011-10-12
[PDF]
State v. Christopher Deon Vance
) to an undisputed set of facts. This presents a question of law and our review is de novo. State v. Holloway
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5772 - 2017-09-19
) to an undisputed set of facts. This presents a question of law and our review is de novo. State v. Holloway
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5772 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Liborio Cianciolo v. Antonina Cianciolo
court’s decision de novo. See Grams v. Boss, 97 Wis. 2d 332, 338, 294 N.W.2d 473 (1980). ¶7 Liborio
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14903 - 2017-09-21
court’s decision de novo. See Grams v. Boss, 97 Wis. 2d 332, 338, 294 N.W.2d 473 (1980). ¶7 Liborio
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14903 - 2017-09-21