Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21141 - 21150 of 29739 for des.
Search results 21141 - 21150 of 29739 for des.
Louis Kapischke v. County of Walworth
of review of the circuit court’s ruling is de novo. See Nielsen v. Waukesha County Bd. of Supervisors, 178
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13771 - 2005-03-31
of review of the circuit court’s ruling is de novo. See Nielsen v. Waukesha County Bd. of Supervisors, 178
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13771 - 2005-03-31
James Antisdel v. City of Oak Creek Police and Fire Commission
of summary judgment is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304, 315, 401 N.W.2d 816, 820
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13464 - 2005-03-31
of summary judgment is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304, 315, 401 N.W.2d 816, 820
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13464 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). “Statutory interpretation is a question of law that we review de novo.” Id. “[T]he purpose of statutory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=265112 - 2020-06-23
). “Statutory interpretation is a question of law that we review de novo.” Id. “[T]he purpose of statutory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=265112 - 2020-06-23
Adele R. Garcia v. Mazda Motor of America, Inc.
that we review de novo. In re Commitment of Franklin, 2004 WI 38, ¶5, ___ Wis. 2d ___, 677 N.W.2d 276
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16666 - 2005-03-31
that we review de novo. In re Commitment of Franklin, 2004 WI 38, ¶5, ___ Wis. 2d ___, 677 N.W.2d 276
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16666 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
motion is sufficient to entitle the defendant to an evidentiary hearing is reviewed de novo. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93295 - 2013-02-25
motion is sufficient to entitle the defendant to an evidentiary hearing is reviewed de novo. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93295 - 2013-02-25
[PDF]
State v. Walter W. Blanck Sr.
or her due process rights raises constitutional issues that we review de novo. State v. Leighton, 2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3562 - 2017-09-19
or her due process rights raises constitutional issues that we review de novo. State v. Leighton, 2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3562 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo whether the court erred in its application of the legal standards for assessing property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170913 - 2017-09-21
review de novo whether the court erred in its application of the legal standards for assessing property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170913 - 2017-09-21
State v. Douglas A. Cavallari
constituted a conspiracy under § 161.41(1x), Stats., is a question of law which this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11753 - 2005-03-31
constituted a conspiracy under § 161.41(1x), Stats., is a question of law which this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11753 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards as the circuit court. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51983 - 2010-07-13
We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards as the circuit court. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51983 - 2010-07-13
[PDF]
State v. David Guzman
” de novo. State v. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d 121, 127-28, 449 N.W.2d 845 (1990) (citation omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15351 - 2017-09-21
” de novo. State v. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d 121, 127-28, 449 N.W.2d 845 (1990) (citation omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15351 - 2017-09-21