Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21151 - 21160 of 29817 for des.
Search results 21151 - 21160 of 29817 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 28, 2015 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Appea...
of coverage under the policy are questions of law which we decide de novo.” See Riccobono v. Seven Star, Inc
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145105 - 2015-07-27
of coverage under the policy are questions of law which we decide de novo.” See Riccobono v. Seven Star, Inc
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145105 - 2015-07-27
State v. Norman O. Brown
to effective assistance of counsel is a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. Id. at 634, 369
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12715 - 2005-03-31
to effective assistance of counsel is a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. Id. at 634, 369
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12715 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. Whether a defendant has been denied this due process right is an issue that we review de novo. Id., ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54673 - 2010-09-28
. Whether a defendant has been denied this due process right is an issue that we review de novo. Id., ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54673 - 2010-09-28
Sanford Gibson v. Department of Corrections
(DOR) interpretation of one of its directives, we decided de novo whether a DOR directive was a rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8117 - 2005-03-31
(DOR) interpretation of one of its directives, we decided de novo whether a DOR directive was a rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8117 - 2005-03-31
Jason E. Kellner v. Richard Christian
of a statute is a question of law, which this court reviews de novo without deference to any lower court ruling
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16864 - 2005-03-31
of a statute is a question of law, which this court reviews de novo without deference to any lower court ruling
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16864 - 2005-03-31
Norvin Lewis v. Physicians Insurance Company of Wisconsin
, our review is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315, 401 N.W.2d 816, 820
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14951 - 2005-03-31
, our review is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315, 401 N.W.2d 816, 820
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14951 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the probable cause standard. See id. This court reviews that question de novo. Id. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136330 - 2015-03-03
the probable cause standard. See id. This court reviews that question de novo. Id. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136330 - 2015-03-03
[PDF]
John W. McDonough v. State of Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development
of these two statutes. ¶10 Statutory interpretation is a question of law that this court reviews de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17337 - 2017-09-21
of these two statutes. ¶10 Statutory interpretation is a question of law that this court reviews de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17337 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
rejected Free’s claim of prosecutorial misconduct because the instances were “of such de minimus effect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=67962 - 2014-09-15
rejected Free’s claim of prosecutorial misconduct because the instances were “of such de minimus effect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=67962 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Frontsheet
are affirmed unless clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=265072 - 2020-06-23
are affirmed unless clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=265072 - 2020-06-23