Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21151 - 21160 of 29722 for des.
Search results 21151 - 21160 of 29722 for des.
[PDF]
Jeanette E. Normington v. Peter J. Normington
on the interpretation of statutes or regulations in making its decision, we review those rulings de novo. See Weis v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16212 - 2017-09-21
on the interpretation of statutes or regulations in making its decision, we review those rulings de novo. See Weis v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16212 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Timothy Cepukenas v. Shelli L. Cepukenas
is a question of law which we review de novo. See Ball v. District No. 4, Area Bd., 117 Wis.2d 529, 537, 345
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12662 - 2017-09-21
is a question of law which we review de novo. See Ball v. District No. 4, Area Bd., 117 Wis.2d 529, 537, 345
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12662 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
The Falk Corporation v. Basil E. Ryan, Jr.
involves an interpretation of the prior order, however, we review the trial court’s interpretation de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10837 - 2017-09-20
involves an interpretation of the prior order, however, we review the trial court’s interpretation de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10837 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, and Twin City now appeals.1 DISCUSSION ¶10 We review summary judgment decisions de novo, using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93318 - 2014-09-15
, and Twin City now appeals.1 DISCUSSION ¶10 We review summary judgment decisions de novo, using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93318 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
7 review is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. State v. Corey J.G., 215 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=305386 - 2020-11-17
7 review is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. State v. Corey J.G., 215 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=305386 - 2020-11-17
[PDF]
NOTICE
erred in denying his motion for summary judgment. We review de novo the grant or denial of summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56188 - 2014-09-15
erred in denying his motion for summary judgment. We review de novo the grant or denial of summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56188 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review of summary judgments is de novo; we apply the same methodology as the trial court and consider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80533 - 2014-09-15
review of summary judgments is de novo; we apply the same methodology as the trial court and consider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80533 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Corrina L. Deichsel
constitutes a “new factor” presents a legal issue which we decide de novo. Id. Whether a “new factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6404 - 2017-09-19
constitutes a “new factor” presents a legal issue which we decide de novo. Id. Whether a “new factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6404 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Thomas H. Highman
we review de novo, although we uphold the trial court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3735 - 2017-09-19
we review de novo, although we uphold the trial court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3735 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Thomas H. Highman
we review de novo, although we uphold the trial court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3736 - 2017-09-19
we review de novo, although we uphold the trial court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3736 - 2017-09-19