Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21151 - 21160 of 51909 for him.

State v. Timothy T. Kozlowski
a judgment of conviction entered after a jury found him guilty of operating a motor vehicle while under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3475 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jeremy Clark
PER CURIAM. Jeremy Clark, a prison inmate, appeals a judgment convicting him of second-degree sexual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5259 - 2012-09-10

[PDF] State v. William E. Hampton
). The trial court considered Hampton's medical problems when it granted him Huber release privileges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9599 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 1, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court of...
CURIAM. Thomas Flynn appeals from a judgment convicting him of two drug felonies. The issue is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28277 - 2007-02-28

Carlos D. Hope v. Phil Kingston
to find him guilty of disciplinary infractions. We affirm. ¶2 Hope was formerly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5617 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
). Morris S. Martin appeals from a judgment convicting him of first-degree reckless injury, use
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=794628 - 2024-05-01

[PDF] State v. Mark A. Johnson
. STAT. § 343.305 punished him for exercising his right not to consent to searches and seizures under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5510 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
convicting him of burglary and an order denying his motion to vacate the $250 DNA surcharge and a ten-dollar
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80196 - 2005-04-02

State v. Jason Luepke
CURIAM. Jason Luepke appeals an amended judgment resentencing him to sixteen years and eight months
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2470 - 2005-03-31

State v. Timothy V. Montgomery
was insufficient to support the “while armed” element of the charges against him; (2) his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20547 - 2007-05-01