Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21151 - 21160 of 63609 for records/1000.
Search results 21151 - 21160 of 63609 for records/1000.
CA Blank Order
record, this court concludes that no issue of arguable merit could be raised on appeal and affirms
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120489 - 2014-09-02
record, this court concludes that no issue of arguable merit could be raised on appeal and affirms
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120489 - 2014-09-02
State v. Edward C. Brandau
the speedy trial issue because the record conclusively shows that Brandau's speedy trial rights were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10139 - 2005-03-31
the speedy trial issue because the record conclusively shows that Brandau's speedy trial rights were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10139 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
from judgment. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=124594 - 2017-09-21
from judgment. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=124594 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102475 - 2013-09-25
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102475 - 2013-09-25
Richard G. Bean v. Marilyn J. Bean
, reasoned decision and applies the correct legal standards to the facts of record. See id. The dual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2320 - 2005-03-31
, reasoned decision and applies the correct legal standards to the facts of record. See id. The dual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2320 - 2005-03-31
State v. Robert T. Langston
.[1] Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11318 - 2005-03-31
.[1] Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11318 - 2005-03-31
Butterfield Refrigeration v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
of a disability is a question of fact and this court must search the record to locate evidence that supports
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10753 - 2005-03-31
of a disability is a question of fact and this court must search the record to locate evidence that supports
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10753 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the Record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=615610 - 2023-02-01
review of the Record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=615610 - 2023-02-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the record and counsel’s report, we conclude that there are no issues with arguable merit for appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205968 - 2017-12-27
the record and counsel’s report, we conclude that there are no issues with arguable merit for appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205968 - 2017-12-27
[PDF]
State v. Michael A. Myers
confidence in the verdict. We also conclude that the record on appeal does not establish that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3310 - 2017-09-19
confidence in the verdict. We also conclude that the record on appeal does not establish that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3310 - 2017-09-19