Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21161 - 21170 of 51560 for Cost-effective treatments https://simplemedrx.top.

State v. Racine County Board of Adjustment
if the cost of such improvements exceeds 50% of the “current estimated equalized assessed value
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10359 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
prejudice and without costs. Based on our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude that summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97089 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
] The court ordered that the vehicle’s value would be divided but any costs attributable to the imposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73299 - 2011-11-08

Patrick McMahon v. Terry W. Ryan
. ¶9 The trial court concluded that McMahon’s testimony that materials cost $3,700 was the only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5428 - 2005-03-31

Town of East Troy v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company
to St. Paul to purchase the policies and seeks to recover costs relating to the defense, investigation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11351 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
dollars [sic] fine.” Mobley’s attorney agreed that Mobley “had [paid] the costs and victim witness fees
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34165 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
an order of the circuit court that affirmed an order of the Medical Examining Board imposing costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108031 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 7, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
costs. Turner, HATS, Inc. and Trinity filed a summary judgment motion, along with a motion seeking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27041 - 2006-11-06

Wildeck, Inc. v. Palmer Building Systems Corporation
of Wildeck, Inc. for the fabrication cost of two steel mezzanines. Palmer argues that usage of trade
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13380 - 2007-02-27

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
The court ordered that the vehicle’s value would be divided but any costs attributable to the imposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73299 - 2014-09-15