Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21161 - 21170 of 30242 for de.
Search results 21161 - 21170 of 30242 for de.
Frontsheet
conclusions of law on a de novo basis. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Inglimo, 2007 WI 126, ¶5
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105746 - 2013-12-16
conclusions of law on a de novo basis. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Inglimo, 2007 WI 126, ¶5
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105746 - 2013-12-16
[PDF]
State v. Sheila E. Novin
, which we review de novo. See State v. Petty, 201 Wis.2d 337, 354–355, 548 N.W.2d 817, 823 (1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12627 - 2017-09-21
, which we review de novo. See State v. Petty, 201 Wis.2d 337, 354–355, 548 N.W.2d 817, 823 (1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12627 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Hugh R. Mommsen v. Duane Schueller
we review de novo. See Minuteman, Inc. v. Alexander, 147 Wis.2d 842, 853, 434 N.W.2d 773, 778
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14709 - 2017-09-21
we review de novo. See Minuteman, Inc. v. Alexander, 147 Wis.2d 842, 853, 434 N.W.2d 773, 778
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14709 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. 2d 111, 700 N.W.2d 62 (citation omitted). This is a question of law we review de novo “based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=540382 - 2022-07-06
. 2d 111, 700 N.W.2d 62 (citation omitted). This is a question of law we review de novo “based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=540382 - 2022-07-06
State v. Laurie A. Koch
, 595 N.W.2d 403 (1999). ¶13 Appellate review of a bindover decision is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15560 - 2005-03-31
, 595 N.W.2d 403 (1999). ¶13 Appellate review of a bindover decision is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15560 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
will review de novo whether an investigatory stop was justified by reasonable suspicion. Id. ¶14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68030 - 2011-07-19
will review de novo whether an investigatory stop was justified by reasonable suspicion. Id. ¶14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68030 - 2011-07-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. Accordingly, we will “independently review whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197650 - 2017-10-11
, is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. Accordingly, we will “independently review whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197650 - 2017-10-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the evidence is,” and if the court omitted it, it would be “de-emphasizing part of the State’s case.” ¶13
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=643558 - 2023-04-11
the evidence is,” and if the court omitted it, it would be “de-emphasizing part of the State’s case.” ¶13
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=643558 - 2023-04-11
[PDF]
Town of Lyndon v. Peter F. Beyer
States Constitution, it is a question of law that we review de novo. Lounge Mgmt., Ltd. v. Town
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2889 - 2017-09-19
States Constitution, it is a question of law that we review de novo. Lounge Mgmt., Ltd. v. Town
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2889 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is a question of law that we review de novo. See id., ¶9. If a defendant’s postconviction motion “does
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=669028 - 2023-06-20
is a question of law that we review de novo. See id., ¶9. If a defendant’s postconviction motion “does
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=669028 - 2023-06-20