Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21161 - 21170 of 58483 for speedy trial.
Search results 21161 - 21170 of 58483 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
several complaints concerning the effectiveness of trial counsel’s representation, including
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=562359 - 2022-09-07
several complaints concerning the effectiveness of trial counsel’s representation, including
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=562359 - 2022-09-07
[PDF]
NOTICE
, and that he is entitled to a new trial in the interests of justice. We conclude that none
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61400 - 2014-09-15
, and that he is entitled to a new trial in the interests of justice. We conclude that none
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61400 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Alex W.S.
to suppress. At the ensuing bench trial, Alex argued that his confession was not sufficiently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14162 - 2014-09-15
to suppress. At the ensuing bench trial, Alex argued that his confession was not sufficiently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14162 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
(2017-18)1 postconviction motion without a hearing. Ruiz-Velez claims his trial counsel performed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237034 - 2019-03-12
(2017-18)1 postconviction motion without a hearing. Ruiz-Velez claims his trial counsel performed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237034 - 2019-03-12
COURT OF APPEALS
. on Sunday. ¶4 After a three-day bench trial, the court asked the parties to brief their positions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35230 - 2009-01-20
. on Sunday. ¶4 After a three-day bench trial, the court asked the parties to brief their positions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35230 - 2009-01-20
[PDF]
State v. Dustin J. Johnson
his plea was not knowing or voluntary and that trial counsel was ineffective. We reject his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24640 - 2017-09-21
his plea was not knowing or voluntary and that trial counsel was ineffective. We reject his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24640 - 2017-09-21
State v. Willie M. Kendricks
. Kendricks argues that: (1) the trial court erred in denying his motion to withdraw his Alford pleas; and (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5177 - 2005-03-31
. Kendricks argues that: (1) the trial court erred in denying his motion to withdraw his Alford pleas; and (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5177 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Maurice S. Ewing
imprisonment, as well as an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Ewing argues his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19333 - 2017-09-21
imprisonment, as well as an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Ewing argues his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19333 - 2017-09-21
Steven M. Lucareli v. Vilas County
and denying their motion for reconsideration.[1] The Lucarelis argue that the trial court erred by denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13746 - 2005-03-31
and denying their motion for reconsideration.[1] The Lucarelis argue that the trial court erred by denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13746 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
his postconviction motion. Gumieny argues the trial court erred by permitting the State to cross
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26882 - 2014-09-15
his postconviction motion. Gumieny argues the trial court erred by permitting the State to cross
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26882 - 2014-09-15