Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21171 - 21180 of 58499 for speedy trial.

[PDF] T & T Masonry, Inc. v. Roxton Associates
., the bank Cowles was working with for financing. On summary judgment the trial court determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9839 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
trial counsel was ineffective by failing to obtain an expert to testify more favorably to the defense
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155762 - 2017-09-21

State v. Thomas W. Jackson
. Both judgments recited a sentence credit of 458 days. Later, on motion of the State, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15467 - 2005-03-31

Steven M. Lucareli v. Vilas County
and denying their motion for reconsideration.[1] The Lucarelis argue that the trial court erred by denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13746 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Dustin J. Johnson
his plea was not knowing or voluntary and that trial counsel was ineffective. We reject his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24640 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Mary A. Cruz v. All Saints Healthcare System, Inc.
for providing health care records. The trial court granted summary judgment dismissing All Saints’ cross
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6399 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
. on Sunday. ¶4 After a three-day bench trial, the court asked the parties to brief their positions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35230 - 2009-01-20

[PDF] NOTICE
his postconviction motion. Gumieny argues the trial court erred by permitting the State to cross
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26882 - 2014-09-15

Steven H. Hoyme v. Janice S. Brakken
motion for relief from a trial court order approving a stipulation for an injunction. Brakken argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5444 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI APP 51
battery and disorderly conduct. On the disorderly conduct charge, the trial court found the offense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94530 - 2014-09-15