Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21181 - 21190 of 69366 for as he.
Search results 21181 - 21190 of 69366 for as he.
Dennis Makeeff v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
that he was disabled by a work-related injury. See Leist v. LIRC, 183 Wis. 2d 450, 457 515 N.W.2d 268
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3342 - 2005-03-31
that he was disabled by a work-related injury. See Leist v. LIRC, 183 Wis. 2d 450, 457 515 N.W.2d 268
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3342 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Daniel W. Harr
the admission of such evidence. Harr discusses how the prosecution used that evidence, but he does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11822 - 2017-09-21
the admission of such evidence. Harr discusses how the prosecution used that evidence, but he does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11822 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
motion to modify his sentence. He argues that: (1) the State breached the plea bargain; (2) the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45827 - 2010-01-19
motion to modify his sentence. He argues that: (1) the State breached the plea bargain; (2) the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45827 - 2010-01-19
[PDF]
State v. Robert Garel
a prior order placing him on probation, claiming this could not be done because he was then on parole
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11821 - 2017-09-21
a prior order placing him on probation, claiming this could not be done because he was then on parole
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11821 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
(2005-06),[1] to withdraw his plea in this 1993 case because he is no longer confined pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33004 - 2008-06-11
(2005-06),[1] to withdraw his plea in this 1993 case because he is no longer confined pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33004 - 2008-06-11
[PDF]
State v. Floyd Hipsher
denying his WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2003-04) postconviction motion in which he argued that the prosecutor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20651 - 2017-09-21
denying his WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2003-04) postconviction motion in which he argued that the prosecutor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20651 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
following separate assaults he perpetrated against two women. The first incident took place in March 2020
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=917568 - 2025-02-20
following separate assaults he perpetrated against two women. The first incident took place in March 2020
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=917568 - 2025-02-20
[PDF]
Oral Argument Synopses - April 2017
differing interpretations. As directed at the end of the form, Wood asked Brar whether he would “submit
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=187340 - 2017-09-21
differing interpretations. As directed at the end of the form, Wood asked Brar whether he would “submit
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=187340 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to deliver and an order denying his postconviction motion seeking plea withdrawal. He argues the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=932542 - 2025-03-26
to deliver and an order denying his postconviction motion seeking plea withdrawal. He argues the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=932542 - 2025-03-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, No. 2014AP1189-CR 2 contrary to WIS. STAT. §§ 943.32(1)(a), 939.32, & 939.05 (2011-12). 1 He also appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134239 - 2017-09-21
, No. 2014AP1189-CR 2 contrary to WIS. STAT. §§ 943.32(1)(a), 939.32, & 939.05 (2011-12). 1 He also appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134239 - 2017-09-21