Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21181 - 21190 of 29722 for des.

[PDF] WI APP 33
recovery. Erdmann appeals. DISCUSSION ¶6 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo using the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59802 - 2014-09-15

State v. Jeremy R. Engebretson
. Finally, we construe a deferred prosecution agreement de novo. See State v. Toliver, 187 Wis. 2d 346, 355
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4687 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI App 60
of a statute to a given set of facts are questions of law that we review de novo. State v. Wiskerchen, 2019
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247870 - 2019-12-06

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
The construction of a contract for the sale of real estate presents a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71555 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Robert E. Ervin v. Great West Casualty Company
summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same standards employed by the circuit court. Smith v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13893 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. DISCUSSION ¶17 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226969 - 2018-11-13

Alvin J. Herlache v. Robin Zahran
of summary judgment raises an issue of law which we review de novo by applying the same standards employed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14525 - 2005-03-31

Robert Pasko v. City of Milwaukee
. ¶6 Our review of the trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. See Green
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15960 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that we review de novo.” State v. McGuire, 2010 WI 91, ¶26, 328 Wis. 2d 289, 786 N.W.2d 227. ¶14 We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=747363 - 2024-01-03

Marco A. Gonzalez v. The Cincinnati Insurance Company
of summary judgment de novo. Waters v. United States Fid. & Guar. Co., 124 Wis. 2d 275, 278, 369 N.W.2d 755
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6516 - 2005-03-31