Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21181 - 21190 of 29810 for des.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
Menard’s motion for summary judgment. DISCUSSION ¶5 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83349 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] The Estate of Martha Burgess v. Carl Peterson
interpretation, which presents a question of law we review de novo. State v. Michels, 141 Wis.2d 81, 87
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10853 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Magett, 2014 WI 67, ¶29, 355 Wis. 2d 617, 850 N.W.2d 42
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=293963 - 2020-10-06

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the constitutional standard is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Badker, 2001 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94010 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
as applied to undisputed facts, and therefore our review is de novo. See Notz v. Everett Smith Group, Ltd
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149289 - 2017-09-21

State v. Corey Miller
review de novo.… However, if the motion fails to allege sufficient facts, the circuit court has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12493 - 2005-03-31

State v. Eddie McAttee
evidence, we determine de novo whether the facts, here undisputed, satisfy the constitutional standards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3149 - 2005-03-31

Meriter Hospital, Inc. v. Dane County
summary judgment to Meriter on the DRG rate issue. We review orders granting summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5806 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
has been denied due process and sentenced on inaccurate information is a question of law we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115293 - 2014-06-23

Gerald Witkowski v. Barry Weber
is a question of law, which we review de novo. See id. Factual findings made by the circuit court shall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15472 - 2005-03-31