Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21181 - 21190 of 59312 for quit claim deed.

[PDF] State v. Edward J. Heuer
affirm the judgment and order. ¶2 When a defendant claims that his or her plea agreement was breached
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7275 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Jaamal D. Bell
when he failed to investigate the claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. ¶5 To establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20010 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Anthony Murphy
statement that Murphy beat her and claimed that several drug dealers named “Slim” and “Big Man” caused her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4149 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that we have his appellate matters “fully sealed.” The grounds for his request are his claimed work
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249763 - 2019-11-07

[PDF] State v. Matthew S. Carlson
an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, a defendant must show both that counsel’s performance was deficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7164 - 2017-09-20

COURT OF APPEALS
the information and that he had to file the claim on his own. ¶3 On October 21, Weed’s doctor took him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46796 - 2010-02-09

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, including claimed violations of constitutional rights. See State v. Kelty, 2006 WI 101, ¶18 & n.11, 294
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219129 - 2018-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
parental rights to Davonta S. Otis claims that Wis. Stat. § 48.415(9) is unconstitutional because: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33381 - 2008-07-14

Joe M. Janz v. Wisconsin State Labor and Industry Review Commission
Review Commission (“LIRC”) that denied his claim for unemployment compensation benefits and required Janz
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20423 - 2006-02-13

R.M. Iverson v. City of River Falls
a judgment dismissing his claim of excessive property tax assessment. He argues (1) the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8997 - 2005-03-31