Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21181 - 21190 of 58483 for speedy trial.
Search results 21181 - 21190 of 58483 for speedy trial.
COURT OF APPEALS
PER CURIAM. Charles Eggenberger appeals an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102261 - 2013-09-23
PER CURIAM. Charles Eggenberger appeals an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102261 - 2013-09-23
Citizens' Utility Board (CUB) v. Public Service Commission of Wisconsin
requirements and deeming it untimely. We agree with the trial court’s conclusion and therefore affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5457 - 2005-03-31
requirements and deeming it untimely. We agree with the trial court’s conclusion and therefore affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5457 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Barbara Doyle v. Ronald A. Arthur
in this case. The Dodge County action was eventually dismissed, and the trial court entered its order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13276 - 2017-09-21
in this case. The Dodge County action was eventually dismissed, and the trial court entered its order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13276 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
certain postconviction discovery issues. Holm also argues that both his trial and postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86269 - 2014-09-15
certain postconviction discovery issues. Holm also argues that both his trial and postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86269 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Rock County Department of Human Services v. Janella R.
an expert witness. Janella also contends that she is entitled to a new trial in the interest of justice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6947 - 2017-09-20
an expert witness. Janella also contends that she is entitled to a new trial in the interest of justice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6947 - 2017-09-20
Barbara Doyle v. Ronald A. Arthur
. The Dodge County action was eventually dismissed, and the trial court entered its order denying Arthur’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13276 - 2005-03-31
. The Dodge County action was eventually dismissed, and the trial court entered its order denying Arthur’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13276 - 2005-03-31
G. Curt Borgwardt v. Ralph Redlin
the trial court's non-final order directing Nelson S. Weine, Esq., a non-party deposition witness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8179 - 2005-03-31
the trial court's non-final order directing Nelson S. Weine, Esq., a non-party deposition witness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8179 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
in permitting him to proceed pro se, there was insufficient evidence presented at trial, and a limiting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59567 - 2011-01-31
in permitting him to proceed pro se, there was insufficient evidence presented at trial, and a limiting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59567 - 2011-01-31
[PDF]
WI APP 10
for postconviction relief. He argues he is entitled to a new trial on the two burglary charges because the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31271 - 2014-09-15
for postconviction relief. He argues he is entitled to a new trial on the two burglary charges because the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31271 - 2014-09-15
State v. Robert E. Tucker
)(a) and 939.05 (1999–2000).[1] He argues that the trial court erred when it denied his motion to suppress two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4730 - 2005-03-31
)(a) and 939.05 (1999–2000).[1] He argues that the trial court erred when it denied his motion to suppress two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4730 - 2005-03-31