Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21191 - 21200 of 64755 for b's.
Search results 21191 - 21200 of 64755 for b's.
State v. Stanley Hess
of understanding of the offense to which he pled. B. Ineffective assistance of counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10591 - 2005-03-31
of understanding of the offense to which he pled. B. Ineffective assistance of counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10591 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 767.451(1)(b) (2009-10).[2] Although the court found there was a substantial change of circumstances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86547 - 2012-08-29
. § 767.451(1)(b) (2009-10).[2] Although the court found there was a substantial change of circumstances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86547 - 2012-08-29
Anjani K. Mehra v. Bay Watch Condominium Association
to the subject matter involved. Amber J.F. v. Richard B., 205 Wis. 2d 510, 516-17, 557 N.W.2d 84 (Ct. App 1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5099 - 2005-03-31
to the subject matter involved. Amber J.F. v. Richard B., 205 Wis. 2d 510, 516-17, 557 N.W.2d 84 (Ct. App 1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5099 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
Hwy LO, Ste. B Eagle, WI 53119 Rebecca Anne Kiefer Assistant District Attorney Children's Court Center
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96917 - 2013-05-14
Hwy LO, Ste. B Eagle, WI 53119 Rebecca Anne Kiefer Assistant District Attorney Children's Court Center
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96917 - 2013-05-14
State v. Nicholas J. Barbian
of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: Marshall B. Murray, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18075 - 2005-05-09
of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: Marshall B. Murray, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18075 - 2005-05-09
COURT OF APPEALS
, § 11.2(b) at 41, 48-49 (4th ed. 2004) (at a hearing on a motion to suppress, the defendant has the burden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82806 - 2012-05-22
, § 11.2(b) at 41, 48-49 (4th ed. 2004) (at a hearing on a motion to suppress, the defendant has the burden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82806 - 2012-05-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-narcotic controlled substance without a valid prescription, contrary to WIS. STAT. § 961.41(3g)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=65432 - 2014-09-15
-narcotic controlled substance without a valid prescription, contrary to WIS. STAT. § 961.41(3g)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=65432 - 2014-09-15
State v. Christina M. Goerlitz
there is no court order requiring support. See Wis. Stat. § 948.22(4)(b) (1997-98).[2] Therefore, although
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15783 - 2005-03-31
there is no court order requiring support. See Wis. Stat. § 948.22(4)(b) (1997-98).[2] Therefore, although
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15783 - 2005-03-31
State v. Sally S.
. (b) The type and seriousness of the offense, including whether it was against persons or property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9245 - 2005-03-31
. (b) The type and seriousness of the offense, including whether it was against persons or property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9245 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
evidence.” See Sec. 62.23(7)(de)2.b. “‘Substantial evidence’ means facts and information, other than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=783285 - 2024-04-03
evidence.” See Sec. 62.23(7)(de)2.b. “‘Substantial evidence’ means facts and information, other than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=783285 - 2024-04-03