Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21191 - 21200 of 82706 for case codes/1000.
Search results 21191 - 21200 of 82706 for case codes/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
as applied to her case. We affirm.[2] ¶2 Joseph was born March 16, 2006, in the hallway of a “crack
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30259 - 2007-09-12
as applied to her case. We affirm.[2] ¶2 Joseph was born March 16, 2006, in the hallway of a “crack
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30259 - 2007-09-12
Edward M. Moran v. Lakeview Investments
We conclude the court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in hearing the three cases together
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7404 - 2005-03-31
We conclude the court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in hearing the three cases together
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7404 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to a revocation term Dalton was serving on an unrelated case.2 At the sentencing hearing, Dalton’s trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1038075 - 2025-11-18
to a revocation term Dalton was serving on an unrelated case.2 At the sentencing hearing, Dalton’s trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1038075 - 2025-11-18
COURT OF APPEALS
concurrent with the Waukesha County case, the only additional time Daniels will have to serve is two years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123855 - 2015-01-13
concurrent with the Waukesha County case, the only additional time Daniels will have to serve is two years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123855 - 2015-01-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of conviction. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. In Barron County Case No. 2021CF338, the State charged Swartz
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1054187 - 2025-12-23
of conviction. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. In Barron County Case No. 2021CF338, the State charged Swartz
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1054187 - 2025-12-23
Edward M. Moran v. Property Management Concepts
We conclude the court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in hearing the three cases together
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7403 - 2005-03-31
We conclude the court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in hearing the three cases together
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7403 - 2005-03-31
State v. Donavin Hemphill
2005 WI App 248 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2004AP2829-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19482 - 2005-12-11
2005 WI App 248 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2004AP2829-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19482 - 2005-12-11
Edward M. Moran v. Property Management Concepts
We conclude the court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in hearing the three cases together
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7405 - 2005-03-31
We conclude the court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in hearing the three cases together
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7405 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and Record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=778878 - 2024-03-27
and Record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=778878 - 2024-03-27
[PDF]
Ronald A. Keith, Sr. v. William D. Ridgely
. In each case, Keith filed a petition for mandamus review, seeking an order requiring Ridgely to release
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13269 - 2017-09-21
. In each case, Keith filed a petition for mandamus review, seeking an order requiring Ridgely to release
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13269 - 2017-09-21