Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21191 - 21200 of 68289 for law.

COURT OF APPEALS
to currently participate in the Earned Release Program (ERP); and (5) Taylor’s cooperation with law enforcement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104656 - 2013-11-20

James Reese v. City of Pewaukee
in this case are not in dispute. The application of a statute to undisputed facts is a question of law which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3780 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. John C. Clincy
demands is a question of law subject to de novo review. See id. “‘[W]hen a policeman has made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12379 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
a question of law that we consider de novo. See id. 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216088 - 2018-07-31

County of Dodge v. Curtis E. Dittberner
of law which we review without deference to the circuit court. See State v. Babbitt, 188 Wis. 2d 349
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16167 - 2005-03-31

Bruce Mieloch v. Country Mutual Insurance Company
.2d 183 (1976). As a general rule, the existence of negligence is a question of law for the jury. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2746 - 2005-03-31

State v. Robert Johnson
that interpretation. We find no compelling reason to revisit our construction of the law at this time. Therefore, we
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16979 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
that the driver is violating a traffic law, or is about to commit an offense. State v. Betow, 226 Wis. 2d 90, 93
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122323 - 2014-09-22

County of Fond du Lac v. Kevin C. Derksen
that they all derive from his erroneous understanding of the law or his refusal to acknowledge such law.[4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4523 - 2005-03-31

Herder Hallmark Consultants, Inc. v. Regnier Consulting Group, Inc.
L. Dreier of First Law Group, S.C., Stevens Point. Respondent ATTORNEYS: On behalf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6689 - 2005-03-31